Bard® Urethral Catheterization Tray with Red Rubber Catheter 771215Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Urethral Catheterization Tray with Red Rubber Catheter · Class 2
All models of Bard Urethral Catheterization Tray with Red Rubber Catheter (4)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741030499), received between Sep 6, 2018 and Jul 14, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inaccurate Flow Rate” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Inaccurate Flow Rate2
- Component Missing1
- No Flow1
- Obstruction of Flow1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 14, 2020Inaccurate Flow Rate; No Flow; Inaccurate Flow Rate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO URINE GOT BACK INTO THE BAG, WHEN THE CATHETER WAS FULLY INSERTED. MSS ADVISED THE USER TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CLAMP WAS RELEASED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10271092 ↗MalfunctionApr 17, 2019Inaccurate Flow Rate; Obstruction of Flow; Inaccurate Flow Rate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO URINE DRAINED FOLLOWING INSERTION OF THE CATHETER. THE STAFF REMOVED THE UNKNOWN RED RUBBER FOLEY AND ATTEMPTED TO FLUSH IT AND FOUND THAT IT WAS OBSTRUCTED AND COULD NOT FLOW. A CATHETER WAS INSERTED AND URINE DRAINAGE WAS SUCCESSFUL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8522974 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018Component Missing
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LUBRICANT PACKAGE WAS MISSING FROM THE FOLEY TRAY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7850780 ↗
Other CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY devices
- MEDLINE DYND13508Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall2 reports
- MEDLINE DYND13514Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall1 report
- MEDLINE DYND13510Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall1 report
- MEDLINE DYND13518Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall1 report
- MEDLINE DYND13522Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall0 reports
- MEDLINE DYND13516Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall0 reports
- MEDLINE DYND13512Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall0 reports
- MEDLINE DYND13616Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETER, URETERAL, GASTRO-UROLOGY1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page