Skip to content

Bard® Foley Tray With Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 908316Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Foley Tray With Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter · Class 2

All models of Bard Foley Tray With Lubri-Sil All-Silicone Foley Catheter (5)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741033087), received between Nov 19, 2020 and Nov 19, 2020 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Material Puncture/Hole1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2020Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FOLEY CATHETER WHICH WAS INFLATED IN THE MALE PATIENT WAS LEAKED DUE TO A HOLE IN THE BALLOON AND THE CATHETER FELL OUT . A SECOND CATHETER WAS INSERTED AND INFLATED PRIOR TO INSERTION. AFTER INSERTION A POPPING SOUND WAS NOTED AND THE CATHETER WAS FELL OUT. ALSO, REPORTED THAT THE THIRD ATTEMPT OF THE FOLEY CATHETER WAS UNSUCCESSFUL DUE TO THE CATHETER WAS UNABLE TO PASS THROUGH THE PROSTATE. PER FOLLOW-UP VIA EMAIL ON 29OCT2020, THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS NO FURTHER FOLEY CATHETER WAS INSERTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10868903 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FOLEY CATHETER WHICH WAS INFLATED IN THE MALE PATIENT WAS LEAKED DUE TO A HOLE IN THE BALLOON AND THE CATHETER FELL OUT. A SECOND CATHETER WAS INSERTED AND INFLATED PRIOR TO INSERTION. AFTER INSERTION A POPPING SOUND WAS NOTED AND THE CATHETER WAS FELL OUT. ALSO, REPORTED THAT THE THIRD ATTEMPT OF THE FOLEY CATHETER WAS UNSUCCESSFUL DUE TO THE CATHETER WAS UNABLE TO PASS THROUGH THE PROSTATE. PER FOLLOW-UP VIA EMAIL ON 29OCT2020, THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS NO FURTHER FOLEY CATHETER WAS INSERTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10868817 ↗

Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices

All CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page