Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 73020LRecalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All Silicone Lubricious Coated 30 cc Foley Catheter · Class 2
All models of Bardex Lubri-Sil All-Silicone Foley Catheter (21)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741034312), received between Apr 18, 2025 and Jun 23, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Puncture/Hole” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Puncture/Hole2
- Difficult to Insert1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 23, 2025Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER CONTACTED REGARDING A MATERIAL SAFETY REPORT CONCERNING FOLEY SILICONE 3-WAY CH18 PROBES, REFERENCE: 73018CAE, BATCH: NGHQ0771. THE PROBLEM RAISED OCCURRED ON TWO OCCASIONS, A PATIENT WAS CATHETERIZED WITH A CATHETER FOR BLADDER LAVAGE. THE CATHETER DID NOT STAY IN PLACE AND THE BALLOON WAS FOUND TO BE DEFLATED AND LEAKING AFTER REMOVAL. THIS LED TO SEVERAL CATHETERIZATIONS, WHICH ENDED UP BEING TRAUMATIC. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE PATIENT HAD NO PARTICULAR OBSTACLE, AND THERE WERE NO HANDLING PROBLEMS AS NURSE WHO HAD ALREADY PERFORMED THE PROCEDURE, DOCTOR PRESENT, PATIENT COOPERATIVE (LOT#: NGHQ0771). A NEW INCIDENT OCCURRED AGAIN WITH THE SAME PATIENT WITH A 3V CH20 PROBE, REFERENCE: 73020CE AND DID NOT HAVE A SAMPLE FOR THIS PROBE (LOT#: NGHP0228). PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON 06JUN2025, THE PATIENT HAD TO BE TREATED AGAIN, WHICH BECAME TRAUMATIC. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNCOMFORTABLE AND CAUSES A LOSS OF TIME AND STRESS. THE EVENT OCCURRED FIRST TIME WAS ON 30MAY2025, AND THE SECOND TIME WAS SHORTLY AFTERWARDS ON THE SAME DAY. THE TWO PROBES THAT BECAME MISALIGNED WERE DISCARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT. HOWEVER, HAVE SEVERAL NEW PROBES FROM
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22308637 ↗MalfunctionJun 23, 2025Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER CONTACTED REGARDING A MATERIAL SAFETY REPORT CONCERNING FOLEY SILICONE 3-WAY CH18 PROBES, REFERENCE (B)(4), BATCH NGHQ0771. THE PROBLEM RAISED OCCURRED ON TWO OCCASIONS, A PATIENT WAS CATHETERIZED WITH A CATHETER FOR BLADDER LAVAGE. THE CATHETER DID NOT STAY IN PLACE AND THE BALLOON WAS FOUND TO BE DEFLATED AND LEAKING AFTER REMOVAL. THIS LED TO SEVERAL CATHETERIZATIONS, WHICH ENDED UP BEING TRAUMATIC. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE PATIENT HAD NO PARTICULAR OBSTACLE, AND THERE WERE NO HANDLING PROBLEMS AS NURSE WHO HAD ALREADY PERFORMED THE PROCEDURE, DOCTOR PRESENT, PATIENT COOPERATIVE (LOT# NGHQ0771) AND (LOT# UNK). A NEW INCIDENT OCCURRED AGAIN WITH THE SAME PATIENT WITH A 3V CH20 PROBE, REFERENCE (B)(4) AND DID NOT HAVE A SAMPLE FOR THIS PROBE (LOT# NGHP0228) AND (LOT# UNK). PER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA IBC ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT HAD TO BE TREATED AGAIN, WHICH BECAME TRAUMATIC. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNCOMFORTABLE AND CAUSES A LOSS OF TIME AND STRESS. THE EVENT OCCURRED FIRST TIME WAS ON (B)(6) 2025, AND THE SECOND TIME WAS SHORTLY AFTERWARDS ON THE SAME DAY. THE TWO PROBES THAT BECAME MISALIGNED WERE DISCARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT. HOWEVER, HA
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22308636 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2025Positioning Failure; Difficult to Insert; Positioning Failure; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DUE TO CUSTOMER BACKORDER ON FOLEY CATHETER, THEY USED A DIFFERENT FRENCH SIZE DURING A PROCEDURE AND DUE TO DIFFICULTY PLACING THE PATIENT WAS REQUIRED TO STAY UNDER ANESTHESIA LONGER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21868593 ↗
Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON512 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON476 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Foley Catheter 1758SI16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON1 death383 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON234 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Temp Sensing Foley Catheter 119216MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON167 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON153 reports
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON151 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bard® Lubri-Sil® Foley Catheter Tray A942216C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON2 recalls46 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page