PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter with Sherlock Tip Location System (TLS) Stylet 9396108DRecalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PowerPICC SOLO Catheter with Sherlock TLS Technology 6F Maximal Barrier Tray with Microintroducer (Triple-Lumen) · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741035937), received between May 15, 2017 and Jun 29, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Material Fragmentation1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 29, 2018Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PICC INSERTION IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT PART OF THE SHERLOCK GUIDEWIRE WAS MISSING. A CHEST X-RAY REVEALED WIRE FRAGMENT IN PATIENTS RIGHT UPPER SHOULDER AREA. THIS WAS A WIRE FRAGMENT THAT BROKE OFF FROM THE SHERLOCK TLS GUIDEWIRE. THE PATIENT REQUIRED TWO SEPARATE INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES TO SAFELY RETRIEVE THE BROKEN WIRE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO LASTING HARM TO PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 7651911 ↗MalfunctionAug 17, 2017Unraveled Material
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE FACILITY THAT THE NURSE HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE MICROEZ INTRODUCER NEEDLE IN THE PATIENT, WHEN RETRACTING THE NEEDLE, THE GUIDEWIRE UNRAVELED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6800187 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2017Entrapment of Device; Difficult to Remove
THE FACILITY REPORTED THAT THEY ARE EXPERIENCING DIFFICULTY INSERTING AND WITHDRAWING THE GUIDEWIRE. ONCE THE GUIDEWIRE IS INSERTED THROUGH THE NEEDLE GUIDE THE WIRE ¿GETS STUCK¿ AND THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) IS UNABLE TO WITHDRAW UNLESS THE GUIDEWIRE AND THE NEEDLE ARE REMOVED TOGETHER. AFTER THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED THE HCP WAS STILL NOT ABLE TO WITHDRAW THE GUIDEWIRE FROM THE NEEDLE, AS IF THERE WAS A ¿KNOT IN THE WIRE¿. HCP USED A MICRO-EZ AND GUIDEWIRE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6568027 ↗
Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7617405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,708 reports
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7655405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,536 reports
- PowerPICC Catheter 3174118Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall402 reports
- L-Cath™ S/L PICC S/L 26GA (1.9F) x 30cmArgon Medical Devices, Inc. · Catheter,Intravascular,Therapeutic,Long-Term Greater Than 30 Days2 recalls245 reports
- PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter 1194108DBard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 recalls216 reports
- Broviac 0600520Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall265 reports
- Groshong® Catheter 7717405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days279 reports
- PowerPICC Catheter 3275118Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days272 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page