Skip to content

PowerHickman 0805810Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PowerHickman 8F Single-Lumen Polyurethane Catheter with SureCuff Ingrowth Cuff (5cm) Intermediate Kit · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PowerHickman (6)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741036668), received between Dec 26, 2022 and Aug 12, 2024 — classified as 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of or Failure to Bond” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 4 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of or Failure to Bond7
  • Material Separation5
  • Fracture1
  • Stretched1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE HAD ALLEGEDLY ISSUES WITH CUFF DETACHING. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED, CUFF STAYED IN THE BODY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19959848 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY HAD ISSUES WITH CUFF DETACHING. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED, CUFF STAYED IN THE BODY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19959847 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 12, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE HAD ALLEGEDLY ISSUES WITH CUFF DETACHING. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED, CUFF STAYED IN THE BODY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19959843 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE CUFF WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND TO BE LOOSENED UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND THE CUFF HAD ALLEGEDLY STAYED IN THE BODY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19903467 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 2, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE CUFF WAS ALLEGEDLY SLIDING UP AND DOWN. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CUFF ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO ADHERE TO THE CATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19017468 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 21, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Stretched; Fracture; Material Separation; Stretched

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE ALLEGEDLY CAME APART. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17169516 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2023Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIME POST CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT, DURING REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER, THE CUFF ALLEGEDLY REMAINED IN PLACE WHICH REQUIRED SURGICAL REMOVAL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16851366 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 26, 2022Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOUR MONTHS THIRTY DAYS POST CHRONIC CATHETER PLACEMENT, THE CUFF WAS ALLEGEDLY DETACHED AND REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT FOLLOWING THE DEVICE CATHETER REMOVAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16046535 ↗

Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices

All Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page