Bardia® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 806316Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardia® All-Silicone Foley Catheter, 30cc Balloon · Class 2
All models of Bardia All-Silicone Foley Catheter (13)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741039119), received between Jun 7, 2018 and Feb 7, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Burst Container or Vessel2
- Material Invagination2
- Material Puncture/Hole2
- Patient-Device Incompatibility2
- Biocompatibility1
- Break1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient8
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
- Urinary Tract Infection4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem2
- Bacterial Infection1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Incorrect Measurement; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Incorrect Measurement; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CRITICAL CARE NURSES REPORTED IN AN ONLINE SURVEY THAT THE ALL-SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER, 2-WAY, STANDARD LENGTH, 30CC BALLOON, 16 FR WAS NOT SUCCESSFULLY PLACED IN THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SIZE WAS RATHER BIG. THEY SWAPPED TO PIG TAIL SIZE 8 AND THEN CONNECTED TO SIZE 16CH TUBING. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 08MAR2025, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COMPLAINT WAS NOT DUE TO DEVICE RELATED FAILURE, BUT THIS OCCURRED DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THEIR CARE NEEDS. THERE WAS NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THE DEVICE. PIG TAIL CATHETER WAS CONSIDERED DUE TO PRESENCE OF BLADDER TUMOR AND PATIENT EXPERIENCING SIGNIFICANT HYDRONEPHROSIS BUT WAS UNFIT FOR SURGERY AT THE TIME. AS URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION FAILED DUE TO BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION. PIGTAIL CATHETER WAS THEN USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332852 ↗MalfunctionAug 2, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SPONTANEOUS REMOVAL OF THE FOLEY CATHETER OCCURRED DUE TO RUPTURE OF THE BALLOON CUFF IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19892286 ↗MalfunctionOct 14, 2022Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 30 CC BALLOON WAS LEAKING AND THE PATIENT FELT IT MAYBE TOO BIG.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15606930 ↗InjuryJun 5, 2020Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN UPON INSERTION AS THE CATHETER WAS RIBBED. THE PATIENT POSSIBLY DEVELOPING URINARY TRACT INFECTION. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REPORTED. IT WAS LATER REPORTED FROM THE CUSTOMER CONTACT VIA PHONE ON 05JUN2020, THE BALLOON ON THE FOLEY CATHETERS WERE RIBBED, SO THEY CAUSED PAIN DURING INSERTION AND REMOVAL. THE CUSTOMER NOTED THAT SHE DEVELOPED A URINARY TRACT INFECTION AS A RESULT OF USING THESE CATHETERS AND WAS PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS.
Patient problems: Pain; Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 10122746 ↗InjuryMar 11, 2020Patient-Device Incompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT SAID SHE GOT A UTI, BUT SHE WAS NOT SURE WHAT CAUSED IT. SHE ALSO SAID SHE WAS NO LONGER USING CATHETERS. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF TREATMENT WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 9819124 ↗InjuryJan 9, 2020Break; Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FOLEY BURST WHILE INSIDE OF THE PATIENT, WHICH CAUSED A UTI. CUSTOMER WAS SEEN BY THE DOCTOR WHO GAVE HER A NEW FOLEY INSERTION TRAY. IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS WERE GIVEN FOR THE UTI.
Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 9571598 ↗InjuryNov 25, 2019Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED FREQUENT BACTERIAL AND URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS FROM USING THE SILICONE CATHETER. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTEDLY PRESCRIBED WITH ANTIBIOTICS TO TREAT THE INFECTION.
Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Unspecified Infection; Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 9371211 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2019Difficult to Remove; Inflation Problem; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SILICONE CATHETER WOULD NOT DEFLATE. A UROLOGIST WAS CONTACTED TO REMOVE THE CATHETER SUCCESSFULLY. THE METHOD BY WHICH THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED IS UNKNOWN. NO PATIENT INJURY/MEDICAL INTERVENTION REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8649508 ↗MalfunctionMay 28, 2019Difficult to Remove; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SILICONE CATHETER WOULD NOT DEFLATE. AT THE TIME WHEN THE COMPLAINT WAS REPORTED THE CATHETER HAD NOT BEEN REMOVED. ALL GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8647713 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2019Material Invagination; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure; Material Invagination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF THE SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER MUSHROOMED DURING USE MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM WHERE A UROLOGIST WAS BROUGHT IN TO REMOVE THE CATHETER. THE METHOD OF CATHETER REMOVAL IS UNKNOWN. THE COMPLAINANT IS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 8611681 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2019Material Invagination; Difficult to Remove; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Invagination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF THE SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER MUSHROOMED DURING USE MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM WHERE A UROLOGIST WAS BROUGHT IN TO REMOVE THE CATHETER. THE METHOD OF THE CATHETER REMOVAL IS UNKNOWN. THE COMPLAINANT IS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 8611677 ↗MalfunctionOct 25, 2018Burst Container or Vessel
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON ON THE FOLEY CATHETER, BURST WHILE IN USE. NO PIECES WERE REPORTED TO BE MISSING AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8005307 ↗MalfunctionOct 3, 2018Failure to Infuse
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF THE CATHETER FAILED TO INFUSE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7930215 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2018Leak/Splash; Material Puncture/Hole; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A PINHOLE IN THE CATHETER. THE LOCATION OF THE PINHOLE WAS NOT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7671403 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2018Difficult to Remove; Mushroomed; Mushroomed
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE NURSE TRIED TO TAKE THE SALINE OUT OF THE BALLOON, THERE WAS ONLY 6ML OF FLUID IN THE BALLOON. THE ARM WAS THEN CUT TO REMOVE THE REMAINING FLUID. THE CATHETER FELT STUCK SO THE PATIENT WENT TO THE DOCTOR TO HAVE IT REMOVED. IT WAS REMOVED BY THE DOCTOR AND ON THE END OF THE CATHETER THERE WAS A "LIP" THAT THE DOCTOR SAID MAY HAVE CAUSED THE CATHETER TO GET CAUGHT UP AND DIFFICULT TO REMOVE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7579292 ↗
Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON512 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON476 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Foley Catheter 1758SI16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON1 death383 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON234 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Temp Sensing Foley Catheter 119216MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON167 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON153 reports
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON151 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bard® Lubri-Sil® Foley Catheter Tray A942216C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON2 recalls46 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page