Bardex® All-Silicone Temperature-Sensing Foley Catheter 119116Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardex® All-Silicone Temperature-Sensing Foley Catheter · Class 2
All models of Bardex All-Silicone Temperature-Sensing Foley Catheter (3)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Bardex all-silicone temperature-sensing Foley catheter is a urinary drainage tube. The 23 reports mostly describe urine not draining smoothly or suddenly releasing, along with leaks and difficulty removing the catheter; there were no deaths or injuries. There are no recalls naming this device, and reports rose from 3 in the previous 12 months to 8 in the latest 12 months.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 20
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 20 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741046032), received between Jun 20, 2017 and Jun 28, 2026 — classified as 20 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Operates Differently Than Expected” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected3
- Fluid/Blood Leak2
- Inaccurate Flow Rate2
- Material Puncture/Hole2
- Material Twisted/Bent2
- Mushroomed2
- Overfill2
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
- No Information3
- Exposure to Body Fluids1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 20 most recent of 20 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 28, 2026Inaccurate Flow Rate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE FOLEY CATHETER BELOW INCIDENTS HAD HAPPENED, (1) DURING ICU CARE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PERIOD WITHOUT URINE DISCHARGE. EVEN AFTER ADJUSTING THE PATIENT'S POSTURE OR STRAIGHTENING THE CATHETER, URINE STILL COULD NOT BE SMOOTHLY DRAINED INTO THE URINE BAG. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT IMMEDIATELY FELT NOTICEABLE BLOATING, AND AFTER ABOUT 2 HOURS, A LARGE AMOUNT OF URINE WOULD FLOW OUT INSTANTLY, ABOUT 200 TO 300ML. (2) WHEN COLLECTING URINE SAMPLES, NURSES FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE BY FOLDING THE DRAINAGE CATHETER SO THAT THE SAMPLE CAN BE COLLECTED 30 MINUTES LATER. WHEN THE TIME COMES, THE NURSE EXTRACTS URINE FROM THE Y BRANCH OF THE URETER, ONLY AIR IS EXTRACTED, AND URINE CANNOT BE OBTAINED. HOWEVER, ONCE THE FOLD IS RELEASED, THE URINE FLOWS SMOOTHLY FROM THE CATHETER INTO THE URINE BAG. (3) NURSES IN GENERAL WARDS OBSERVE THAT EVEN WHEN THE CATHETER IS IN NORMAL USE, URINARY LEAKAGE STILL OCCURS. WHEN WITHDRAWING, THE WATER BALLOON IS DRAWN FIRST, BUT THE D AND W IS ONLY 3.5ML, WHICH DIFFERS FROM THE ORIGINAL D AND W OF 5ML INJECTED DURING CATHETERIZATION. THIS SITUATION IS NOT A SINGLE CASE; IT HAS OCCURRED REPEATEDLY IN MULTIPLE PATIENTS AND IS
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25648334 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2026Fluid/Blood Leak
It was reported that During use of the foley catheter below incidents had happened, (1) During ICU care, the patient experienced a period without urine discharge. Even after adjusting the patient's posture or straightening the catheter, urine still could not be smoothly drained into the urine bag. However, the patient immediately felt noticeable bloating, and after about 2 hours, a large amount of urine would flow out instantly, about 200-300ml. (2) When collecting urine samples, nurses follow the procedure by folding the drainage catheter so that the sample can be collected 30 minutes later. When the time comes, the nurse extracts urine from the Y-branch of the ureter, only air is extracted, and urine cannot be obtained. However, once the fold is released, the urine flows smoothly from the catheter into the urine bag. (3) Nurses in general wards observe that even when the catheter is in normal use, urinary leakage still occurs. When withdrawing, the water balloon is drawn first, but the D/W is only 3.5ml, which differs from the original D/W of 5ml injected during catheterization. This situation is not a single case; it has occurred repeatedly in multiple patients and is not limite
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25643276 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2026Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE FOLEY CATHETER BELOW INCIDENTS HAD HAPPENED, (1) DURING ICU CARE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PERIOD WITHOUT URINE DISCHARGE. EVEN AFTER ADJUSTING THE PATIENT'S POSTURE OR STRAIGHTENING THE CATHETER, URINE STILL COULD NOT BE SMOOTHLY DRAINED INTO THE URINE BAG. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT IMMEDIATELY FELT NOTICEABLE BLOATING, AND AFTER ABOUT 2 HOURS, A LARGE AMOUNT OF URINE WOULD FLOW OUT INSTANTLY, ABOUT 200-300ML. (2) WHEN COLLECTING URINE SAMPLES, NURSES FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE BY FOLDING THE DRAINAGE CATHETER SO THAT THE SAMPLE CAN BE COLLECTED 30 MINUTES LATER. WHEN THE TIME COMES, THE NURSE EXTRACTS URINE FROM THE Y-BRANCH OF THE URETER, ONLY AIR IS EXTRACTED, AND URINE CANNOT BE OBTAINED. HOWEVER, ONCE THE FOLD IS RELEASED, THE URINE FLOWS SMOOTHLY FROM THE CATHETER INTO THE URINE BAG. (3) NURSES IN GENERAL WARDS OBSERVE THAT EVEN WHEN THE CATHETER IS IN NORMAL USE, URINARY LEAKAGE STILL OCCURS. WHEN WITHDRAWING, THE WATER BALLOON IS DRAWN FIRST, BUT THE D/W IS ONLY 3.5ML, WHICH DIFFERS FROM THE ORIGINAL D/W OF 5ML INJECTED DURING CATHETERIZATION. THIS SITUATION IS NOT A SINGLE CASE; IT HAS OCCURRED REPEATEDLY IN MULTIPLE PATIENTS AND IS NOT LIMITE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25643274 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2026Nonstandard Device; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE FOLEY CATHETER BELOW INCIDENTS HAD HAPPENED, (1) DURING ICU CARE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PERIOD WITHOUT URINE DISCHARGE. EVEN AFTER ADJUSTING THE PATIENT'S POSTURE OR STRAIGHTENING THE CATHETER, URINE STILL COULD NOT BE SMOOTHLY DRAINED INTO THE URINE BAG. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT IMMEDIATELY FELT NOTICEABLE BLOATING, AND AFTER ABOUT 2 HOURS, A LARGE AMOUNT OF URINE WOULD FLOW OUT INSTANTLY, ABOUT 200-300ML. (2) WHEN COLLECTING URINE SAMPLES, NURSES FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE BY FOLDING THE DRAINAGE CATHETER SO THAT THE SAMPLE CAN BE COLLECTED 30 MINUTES LATER. WHEN THE TIME COMES, THE NURSE EXTRACTS URINE FROM THE Y-BRANCH OF THE URETER, ONLY AIR IS EXTRACTED, AND URINE CANNOT BE OBTAINED. HOWEVER, ONCE THE FOLD IS RELEASED, THE URINE FLOWS SMOOTHLY FROM THE CATHETER INTO THE URINE BAG. (3) NURSES IN GENERAL WARDS OBSERVE THAT EVEN WHEN THE CATHETER IS IN NORMAL USE, URINARY LEAKAGE STILL OCCURS. WHEN WITHDRAWING, THE WATER BALLOON IS DRAWN FIRST, BUT THE D/W IS ONLY 3.5ML, WHICH DIFFERS FROM THE ORIGINAL D/W OF 5ML INJECTED DURING CATHETERIZATION. THIS SITUATION IS NOT A SINGLE CASE; IT HAS OCCURRED REPEATEDLY IN MULTIPLE PATIENTS AND IS NOT LIMITE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25552748 ↗MalfunctionJan 12, 2026Fluid/Blood Leak; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AS SOON AS THE FOLEY CATHETER WAS CONNECTED, IT STARTED LEAKING FROM THE BI-DIRECTIONAL NECK JOINT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24036701 ↗MalfunctionOct 17, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER MILKING, THE TEMPERATURE-SENSING WIRE BECOMES A COILED SHAPE OF THE FOLEY CATHETER WITHOUT LEAKAGE.
Patient problems: Exposure to Body Fluids
MAUDE report 23330578 ↗MalfunctionAug 26, 2025Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED THAT LEAKAGE WAS NOTED DURING BALLOON INFLATION OF THE FOLEY CATHETER. THE ISSUE WAS RESOLVED AFTER REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22894692 ↗MalfunctionJul 14, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Rupture; Material Fragmentation; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLEY CATHETER HAD LEAKAGE DUE TO CATHETER RUPTURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22493981 ↗MalfunctionDec 28, 2023Inaccurate Flow Rate; Inaccurate Flow Rate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLEY CATHETER COULD NOT DRAIN URINE AT THE 10TH DAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18409539 ↗MalfunctionMar 15, 2023Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN THE PACKAGING OF 119116 CATHETER, IT WAS MENTIONED AS SILICONE ELASTOMER FOLEY CATHETER. WHEN THE USER LOOKED AT THE PHOTO SAMPLE, THE USER THOUGHT IT WAS A 100 PERCENT SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER. THE USER ASKED TO CONFIRM WHICH ONE IT WAS SILICONE ELASTOMER OR 100 PERCENT SILICONE AND IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT 119116 WAS A BARDEX ALL-SILICONE TEMPERATURE-SENSING 400-SERIES FOLEY CATHETER. THE USER ASKED ABOUT FIXING THIS LABEL ON THE COVER OF 119116 AS THE SHAFT STATED IT WAS A 100% SILICONE ELASTOMER. THE USER WAS NOT SURE HOW SOME OUS LABELS DIFFER FROM US. THEY FOUND IT ODD THAT IT STATED LATEX-FREE AND SILICONE-ELASTOMER AND THOUGHT IT COULD HAD DIFFERENT MEANINGS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16548204 ↗MalfunctionMar 15, 2021Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FOLEY CATHETER HAD BEEN IN THE PATIENT FOR ONLY FEW HOURS, AND IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TEMPERATURE CABLE INSIDE OF THE FOLEY WAS UNRAVELING AND DISTORTING THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO TRAVELLING OR UNUSUAL MANIPULATION OF THE FOLEY WAS REPORTED. IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED, ALSO PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11490405 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2017Mushroomed
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER HAD A MUSHROOM.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6811895 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2017Kinked
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER HAD A KNOT IN IT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6811894 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2017Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER LEAKED FROM AN UNKNOWN SOURCE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. PER MEDWATCH: THE PLASTIC PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE BAG, WHERE IT CONNECTS TO THE UROMETER WAS LEAKING.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6723918 ↗MalfunctionJul 11, 2017Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SAMPLE INSPECTION, THERE WAS EXCESS SILICONE ON THE TIP OF THE CATHETER FOUND.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6700477 ↗MalfunctionJul 6, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, UPON INSPECTION OF THE SAMPLE RECEIVED, THERE APPEARED TO BE EXCESS SILICONE ON THE BIFURCATION VALVE BASE AND ON THE TIP OF THE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6689350 ↗MalfunctionJul 5, 2017Mushroomed
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF THE CATHETER HAD A MUSHROOM/RIDGE.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6688672 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2017Product Quality Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE CATHETER AND THE INFLATION LUMEN AREAS APPEARED TO HAVE EXCESS SILICONE. THIS COMPLAINT WAS OPENED BECAUSE ASSOCIATE FA ENGINEER FOUND ISSUES OUTSIDE OF WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6672506 ↗MalfunctionJun 21, 2017Overfill; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER CONTAINED EXCESS SILICONE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6658969 ↗MalfunctionJun 20, 2017Overfill; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER PORTION OF THE DEVICE CONTAINED EXCESS SILICONE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6654676 ↗
Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON512 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON476 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Foley Catheter 1758SI16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON1 death383 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON234 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Temp Sensing Foley Catheter 119216MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON167 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON153 reports
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON151 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bard® Lubri-Sil® Foley Catheter Tray A942216C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON2 recalls46 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page