Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 997710Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Bard X-Force Balloon Dilation Catheter (22)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741052149), received between Apr 3, 2017 and Jan 29, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Kinked1
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- No Information1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 29, 2018Kinked
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SAMPLE EVALUATION, THE SAMPLE ALSO HAD A KINK IN IT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7225807 ↗MalfunctionDec 14, 2017Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON RUPTURED AFTER 30 SECONDS OF PUMPING THE BALLOON DUE TO A SEVERE URETERAL STRICTURE.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 7116493 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2017Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON LEAKED. IT WAS LATER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A URETERAL STRICTURE. THE CATHETER BALLOON WAS DILATED AT THE URETER OF THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE WHEN INSERTING THE CATHETER. THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS PLACED AND DILATED AT THE URETER FOR ABOUT TWO MINUTES, AFTER WHICH THE BALLOON CATHETER BEGAN TO LEAK. THE PROCEDURE; HOWEVER, WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER REPORTED PROBLEMS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6455009 ↗
Other DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL devices
- Porges Coloplast RBD014Coloplast A/S · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL1 recall0 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998706C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL38 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998606C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL27 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998006C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL25 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998806C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL23 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998504C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL16 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998004C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL15 reports
- Bard® X-Force® Balloon Dilation Catheter 998506C. R. Bard, Inc. · DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL15 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page