DuaLok™ LW0107Recalls & reported problems
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · DuaLok™ Breast Lesion Localization Wire, 20g x 10.7cm · Class 1 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741079757), received between Aug 22, 2018 and Aug 27, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break4
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem4
- Difficult to Remove3
- Difficult to Advance2
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
- Migration1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
- Excessive Tear Production1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 27, 2026Break
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent an X ray guided breast localization wire procedure using the DuaLok Localization Wire. During the procedure the device Guidewire was broken. There was no reported patient injury.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50479615 ↗InjuryMar 5, 2026Break; Difficult to Remove
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST LOCALIZATION WIRE PROCEDURE USING THE DUALOK WIRE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE WIRE WAS BROKEN AND DIFFICULT TO REMOVE THE WIRE FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 24517062 ↗MalfunctionJan 9, 2026Break
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A ULTRASOUND GUIDE PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST TISSUE LOCALIZATION PROCEDURE VIA NORMAL DENSITY TISSUE BY USING THE DUALOCK LOCALISATION WIRE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE WIRE ALLEGEDLY BROKE CLEANLY IN TWO. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24016866 ↗InjuryAug 26, 2024Break; Migration; Break; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED LOCALIZATION WIRE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE WIRE HAD TO BE REPOSITIONED AND RE-SHEATHED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT AT THE TIME OF PERFORMING MAMMOGRAPHY FOR ITS VERIFICATION, ONE OF ITS HOOKS WAS ALLEGEDLY BROKEN, MOVING AND NOT BEING ABLE TO STAY SECURELY IN THE BREAST. FURTHERMORE, AS IT WAS ALREADY IN POSITION IN THE BREAST, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO LEAVE IT IN POSITION FIXED ON THE OUTSIDE WITH MESH AND PATCHES. REPORTEDLY, SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN FRAGMENTS. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 20063412 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY HAD LABELLING PROBLEM, AS THE LABEL HAS THE RIGHT INDICATION BUT THE REST OF THE PACKAGING HAD DIFFERENT PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18709290 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY HAD LABELLING PROBLEM, AS THE LABEL HAS THE RIGHT INDICATION BUT THE REST OF THE PACKAGING HAD DIFFERENT PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18709253 ↗MalfunctionNov 13, 2023Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY HAD LABELLING PROBLEM, AS THE LABEL HAS THE RIGHT INDICATION BUT THE REST OF THE PACKAGING HAD DIFFERENT PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18117809 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2021Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MRI GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY MISLABELED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13041083 ↗MalfunctionNov 22, 2021Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND WITH FOREIGN MATERIAL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12850404 ↗MalfunctionApr 4, 2019Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 1 MALFUNCTION EVENT INVOLVING 2 DEVICES ON THE SAME PATIENT. A REVIEW OF THE EVENT INDICATED THAT MODEL LW0107 BREAST LOCALIZATION WIRE EXPERIENCED BOTH DIFFICULTY TO ADVANCE AND DIFFICULTY TO REMOVE ON BOTH DEVICES. THIS WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THE EVENT INVOLVED A PATIENT WITH NO REPORTED INJURY. THE PATIENT IS FEMALE, AND AGE AND WEIGHT WERE NOT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8485527 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2018Positioning Failure; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance; Positioning Failure; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY INTO NORMAL TISSUE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO DEPLOY AND WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE FROM THE PATIENT. A TEAR IN THE PATIENT'S TISSUE OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT A PLANNED SECONDARY INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE BIOPSY. THE PATIENT IS STABLE.
Patient problems: Excessive Tear Production
MAUDE report 7807552 ↗
Other GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL devices
- GHIATAS® 47920Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL20 reports
- GHIATAS® 47720Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL7 reports
- GHIATAS® 477201Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL7 reports
- PERL Localization Device R2020Focal Therapeutics, Inc. · Guide, Needle, Surgical7 reports
- GHIATAS® 475201Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL6 reports
- GHIATAS® 479201Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL5 reports
- DuaLok™ LW0077Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL5 reports
- DuaLok™ LW0057Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GUIDE, NEEDLE, SURGICAL3 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.