HydroSil Go™ Intermittent Urinary Catheter 71810Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · HydroSil Go® Intermittent Urinary Catheter · Class 2
All models of HydroSil Go Intermittent Urinary Catheter (6)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741097973), received between Apr 25, 2017 and Aug 30, 2021 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper Chemical Reaction” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Improper Chemical Reaction2
- Inaccurate Flow Rate1
- Incorrect Measurement1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Pain4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 30, 2021Improper Chemical Reaction; Improper Chemical Reaction
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOME INTERMITTENT CATHETERS DID NOT SEEM TO HAVE ANY HYDROPHILIC COATING ON THEM OR IT SEEMED TO BE ON THE HANDLE AND NOT THE INSERTION TIP AND MAKING IT PAINFUL DURING INSERTION. ALSO STATED THAT SOME CATHETERS SEEMED MORE LIKE A 12 CH INSTEAD OF 10 CH ON RARE OCCASIONS AND MADE INSERTION PAINFUL.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12381756 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2021Improper Chemical Reaction; Improper Chemical Reaction
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOME INTERMITTENT CATHETERS DID NOT SEEM TO HAVE ANY HYDROPHILIC COATING ON THEM OR IT SEEMED TO BE ON THE HANDLE AND NOT ON THE INSERTION TIP AND MAKING IT PAINFUL DURING INSERTION. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT SOME CATHETERS SEEMED MORE LIKE A 12 CH INSTEAD OF 10 CH ON RARE OCCASIONS AND MADE THE INSERTION PAINFUL. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12381755 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2021Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOME INTERMITTENT CATHETERS DID NOT SEEM TO HAVE ANY HYDROPHILIC COATING ON THEM OR IT SEEMED TO BE ON THE HANDLE AND NOT ON THE INSERTION TIP AND MAKING IT PAINFUL DURING INSERTION. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT SOME CATHETERS SEEMED MORE LIKE A 12 CH INSTEAD OF 10 CH ON RARE OCCASIONS AND MADE INSERTION PAINFUL.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12381753 ↗MalfunctionAug 10, 2019Inaccurate Flow Rate; Inaccurate Flow Rate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HYDROSIL INTERMITTENT CATHETER WAS NOT COMPLETELY DRAINING THE PATIENT'S BLADDER.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8881549 ↗MalfunctionApr 25, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 3 SAMPLES WERE FOUND TO BE PAINFUL ON BOTH INSERTION AND REMOVAL. NO MEDICAL ATTENTION WAS NEEDED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 6520613 ↗
Other CATHETER, STRAIGHT devices
- Magic3 Go Male Catheter with SureGrip 53814GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, STRAIGHT1 recall490 reports
- Magic3 Go Male Coude Catheter with SureGrip 50814GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, STRAIGHT1 recall3 deaths416 reports
- Magic3 Go™ Intermittent Urinary Catheter 51814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, STRAIGHT1 recall327 reports
- Magic3 Go Male Coude Catheter with SureGrip 50816GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, STRAIGHT1 recall239 reports
- Magic3 Go Male Catheter with SureGrip 53816GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, STRAIGHT1 recall164 reports
- Magic3 Go Male Catheter with SureGrip 53812GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, STRAIGHT1 recall120 reports
- Magic3 Go™ Intermittent Urinary Catheter 51812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, STRAIGHT1 recall109 reports
- CURE CATHETER HM14Convatec, Purchasing Department · Catheter, Straight154 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page