Bard Vertus Foley Catheter 0165B16Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard Vertus Foley Catheter 5cc Balloon with COMFORTGUARD Coating · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741099212), received between Feb 14, 2020 and Feb 14, 2020 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inflation Problem” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Inflation Problem2
- Difficult to Insert1
- Failure to Infuse1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 14, 2020Inflation Problem; Failure to Infuse; Failure to Infuse
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE EVALUATOR STATED THAT THEY WERE UNSURE IF THE CATHETER WAS COMFORTABLE FOR THE PATIENT, AS THE CATHETER WAS TOO FLEXIBLE.THEY FELT AS THOUGH THEY HAD TO CRAM IT INTO THE URETHRA.IT WAS DIFFICULT TO INFLATE THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WOULD NOT INFLATE AND STAY IN PLACE. THE HOSPITAL WAS ABLE TO PUT A SMALL AMOUNT OF WATER INTO THE CATHETER FROM THE SYRINGE PRIOR TO INFLATION.TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED AND THE CATHETER WAS REPOSITIONED. THE CATHETER DID NOT MEET ANY RESISTANCE INTERNALLY. THE PATIENT HAD AN EPIDURAL, AND THERE WAS NO OCCLUSION UPON REMOVAL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9711874 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2020Inflation Problem; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE EVALUATOR STATED THAT THEY WERE UNSURE IF THE CATHETER WAS COMFORTABLE FOR THE PATIENT, AS THE CATHETER WAS TOO FLEXIBLE. THEY FELT AS THOUGH THEY HAD TO CRAM IT INTO THE URETHRA. IT WAS DIFFICULT TO INFLATE THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WOULD NOT INFLATE AND STAY IN PLACE. THE HOSPITAL WAS ABLE TO PUT A SMALL AMOUNT OF WATER INTO THE CATHETER FROM THE SYRINGE PRIOR TO INFLATION. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS PERFORMED AND THE CATHETER WAS REPOSITIONED. THE CATHETER DID NOT MEET ANY RESISTANCE INTERNALLY. THE PATIENT HAD AN EPIDURAL AND THERE WAS NO OCCLUSION UPON REMOVAL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9711776 ↗
Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON512 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON476 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Foley Catheter 1758SI16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON1 death383 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON234 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Temp Sensing Foley Catheter 119216MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON167 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON153 reports
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON151 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bard® Lubri-Sil® Foley Catheter Tray A942216C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON2 recalls46 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page