Skip to content

COVERA AVFM08040Recalls & reported problems

Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · COVERA™ Vascular Covered Stent 8 mm x 40 mm (80 cm delivery catheter) (flared) · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741106507), received between Jul 16, 2019 and Jul 9, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Obstruction of Flow” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Dec 22, 2022Open, Classified

    An increase in the reported complaint rate for inability to deploy was identified and related to poor slide block bonding.

    Z-1108-2023 · Root cause: Unknown/Undetermined by firm · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Obstruction of Flow3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Stenosis3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Restenosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2026Migration or Expulsion of Device

    On b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a stent placement procedure using a Covera Vascular Covered Stent. During the procedure, while the delivery system was being withdrawn following stent deployment, the stent migrated distally by approximately 6 cm. To secure the migrated stent, an additional stent was deployed. It was further reported that the patient has a functioning shunt and is being closely monitored to assess continued access patency and stent stability. There was no reported patient injury.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25762528 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL, THAT APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AND TWO MONTHS POST STENT PLACEMENT, THE SUBJECT EXPERIENCED TARGET LESION RE-STENOSIS AND AN ARTERIOVENOUS (AV) ACCESS CIRCUIT RE-INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) WAS PERFORMED TO SUCCESSFULLY TREAT THE TARGET LESION RE-STENOSIS AND THE RE-INTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL. FURTHERMORE, ONE YEAR, TWO MONTHS AND TWENTY-FIVE DAYS POST INDEX PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT HAD AN ADVERSE EVENT OF SEPSIS FOLLOWING UNRELATED GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. HOWEVER, THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE INDEX PROCEDURE, NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE AND NOT RELATED TO THE ARTERIOVENOUS (AV) ACCESS CIRCUIT. REPORTEDLY, THE SUBJECT EXPIRED IN THE PALLIATIVE CARE AND THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF DEATH WAS INFECTION FOLLOWING CHOLECYSTECTOMY. HOWEVER, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE DEATH WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, NOT RELATED TO THE INDEX PROCEDURE AND NOT RELATED TO THE ARTERIOVENOUS (AV) ACCESS CIRCUIT.

    Patient problems: Restenosis

    MAUDE report 18298102 ↗
  • InjuryJul 18, 2019Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL APPROXIMATELY EIGHT MONTHS POST INDEX PROCEDURE, 50% STENOSIS LESION WAS IDENTIFIED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED RE-INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED WITH SUCCESSFUL RESULT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED DURING 24-MONTH FOLLOW-UP, STENOSIS WAS IDENTIFIED, AND STANDARD PTA WAS USED TO TREAT THE LESION.

    Patient problems: Stenosis

    MAUDE report 8805394 ↗
  • InjuryJul 16, 2019Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL, APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR 7-MONTH POST INDEX PROCEDURE, 80% STENOSIS WAS IDENTIFIED AT THE TARGET LESION. PTA BALLOON WAS USED TO TREAT THE LESION WITH RESULT OF 10% RESIDUAL STENOSIS POST PROCEDURE. THE OUTCOME OF THE EVENT WAS RESOLVED AND RECOVERED.

    Patient problems: Stenosis

    MAUDE report 8794462 ↗
  • InjuryJul 16, 2019Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL APPROXIMATELY EIGHT MONTHS POST INDEX PROCEDURE, 50% STENOSIS LESION WAS IDENTIFIED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED RE-INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED WITH SUCCESSFUL RESULT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED DURING 24-MONTH FOLLOW-UP, STENOSIS WAS IDENTIFIED, AND STANDARD PTA WAS USED TO TREAT THE LESION.

    Patient problems: Stenosis

    MAUDE report 8794458 ↗

Other System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment devices

All System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page