Skip to content

Phasix 1191020Recalls & reported problems

Davol Inc. · Phasix Mesh, 4" x 8" (10 cm x 20 cm), Rectangle · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741107573), received between Jan 9, 2023 and Mar 6, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 5 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520265
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient-Device Incompatibility6
  • Defective Device1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Seroma5
  • Bowel Perforation1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Pain1
  • Scar Tissue1
  • Sepsis1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 6, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN OPEN VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PHASIX MESH. POST IMPLANT THE SURGEON ADVISED THAT A MILD SEROMA WAS OBSERVED OVER A PERIOD OF 12-15 MONTHS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MESH REMAINS IMPLANTED, NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION NEEDED, AND THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Seroma

    MAUDE report 18846425 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN OPEN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PHASIX MESH. POST IMPLANT THE SURGEON ADVISED THAT A MILD SEROMA WAS OBSERVED OVER A PERIOD OF 12-15 MONTHS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MESH REMAINS IMPLANTED, NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION NEEDED, AND THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Seroma

    MAUDE report 18846424 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN OPEN VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PHASIX MESH. POST IMPLANT THE SURGEON ADVISED THAT A MILD SEROMA WAS OBSERVED OVER A PERIOD OF 12-15 MONTHS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MESH REMAINS IMPLANTED, NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION NEEDED, AND THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Seroma

    MAUDE report 18846419 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN OPEN INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PHASIX MESH. POST IMPLANT THE SURGEON ADVISED THAT A MILD SEROMA WAS OBSERVED OVER A PERIOD OF 12-15 MONTHS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MESH REMAINS IMPLANTED, NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION NEEDED, AND THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Seroma

    MAUDE report 18846418 ↗
  • InjuryMar 5, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN OPEN VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PHASIX MESH. POST IMPLANT THE SURGEON ADVISED THAT A MILD SEROMA WAS OBSERVED OVER A PERIOD OF 12-15 MONTHS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MESH REMAINS IMPLANTED, NO MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION NEEDED, AND THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Seroma

    MAUDE report 18836058 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2023Defective Device; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Defective Device; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ATTORNEY ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY FOR IMPLANT OF AN UNSPECIFIED BARD MESH (BARD FLAT MESH) ON (B)(6) 2019. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT IS MAKING A CLAIM FOR AN ADVERSE PATIENT OUTCOME AGAINST THE BARD MESH (BARD FLAT MESH). ATTORNEY ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT HAD SUBSEQUENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION DUE TO THE HERNIA MESH DEVICE. IT IS ALSO ALLEGED THAT THE PATIENT SUSTAINED PERSONAL INJURY, EXPERIENCED EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND THE DEVICE WAS DEFECTIVE.

    Patient problems: Bowel Perforation; Insufficient Information; Pain; Scar Tissue; Sepsis; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16120153 ↗

Other surgical film devices

All surgical film devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.