Skip to content

Phasix 1192540Recalls & reported problems

Davol Inc. · Phasix Mesh, 10" x 16" (25 cm x 40 cm), Rectangle · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00801741107658), received between Dec 19, 2023 and Dec 19, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defective Device1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bacterial Infection1
  • Necrosis1
  • Wound Dehiscence1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 19, 2023Defective Device; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Defective Device; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    PER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PATIENT'S ATTORNEY: (B)(6) 2013 - PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH RECURRENT INCARCERATED INCISIONAL VENTRAL HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT OPEN REPAIR WITH THE IMPLANT OF VENTRIO MESH (DEVICE #1). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, "THE HERNIA SAC WAS IDENTIFIED AND EXCISED. A VENTRIO MESH (DEVICE #1) WAS POSITIONED INTO THE PERITONEAL CAVITY AND TACKED TO THE ANTERIOR ABDOMINAL CAVITY." (B)(6) 2013 - PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH ABDOMINAL WALL INFECTION, CELLULITIS AND INFECTED MESH THEREBY UNDERWENT EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY WITH THE REMOVAL OF MESH (DEVICE #1). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, "INCISION WAS CARRIED DOWN TO THE LEVEL OF THE MESH (DEVICE #1) AND NOTED THAT THERE WAS A COPIOUS AMOUNT OF FLUID AROUND THE MESH AND SUCTIONED OUT. LYSIS OF ADHESIONS WAS PERFORMED AND THERE WAS NOTED SOME ADHERENT SMALL BOWEL INTRABDOMINAL CONTENT. ONCE, THIS WAS DONE THE MESH (DEVICE #1) WAS REMOVED." (B)(6) -2018 - PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH VENTRAL HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT OPEN REPAIR WITH THE IMPLANT OF PHASIX MESHES (DEVICE #2 & DEVICE #3). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, ¿HERNIA SAC WAS RESECTED AND A PHASIX MESH (DEVICE #2) WAS TRIMMED, PLACED AND SUTURED TO THE RECTUS SHEATH. ANOTHER PHASIX MESH (DEVICE

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Necrosis; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 18354051 ↗

Other surgical film devices

All surgical film devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.