PowerPICC Provena S9395108DRecalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · DOT PPICC SOLO KR, 5F TL, Max w/TLS · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PowerPICC Provena (116)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741112911), received between Nov 19, 2020 and Mar 21, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Entrapment of Device1
- Failure to Infuse1
- Material Deformation1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Insufficient Information1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 21, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THE "POWERPICC SOLO PROVENA TRIPLE LUMEN PICCS ARE KINKING." THEY STATE THIS IS NOT HAPPENING ON THE NON-SOLO TRIPLE LUMEN PROVENA PICCS. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16587959 ↗MalfunctionJan 29, 2021Failure to Infuse; Failure to Infuse; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
IT WAS REPORTED "CUSTOMER SHARED THAT THE SOLO VALVES ON TRIPLE LUMEN PICC STOPPED WORKING AFTER A FEW HOURS OF PLACING IT. IT WORKED WELL AT INSERTION AND AFTER INITIAL INSERTION HOWEVER ONCE IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE ACCESSED HOURS LATER IT DID NOT WORK. PATIENT HAD AN X-RAY AND THEY WERE INSTRUCTED TO PULL IT BACK. DESPITE DOING SO IT DID NOT WORK. CUSTOMER HAS THE PICC AND WILL SEND IT IN FOR EVALUATION" ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 01/11/2020: "A COUPLE HOURS AFTER PLACEMENT THE NURSE CALLED THE VAT TEAM SAYING IT WOULD NO FLUSH OR DRAW. TEAM WENT AND EVALUATED, DRESSING CHANGE COMPLETED. NO KINKS OR ISSUES NOTED. PULLED LINE BACK A COUPLE CM, LINE CONTINUED NOT TO WORK. X-RAY ORDERED; NO ISSUES FOUND. REPLACED LINE."
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11251978 ↗MalfunctionDec 11, 2020Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED AFTER CUSTOMER GAINED ACCESS WITH NEEDLE, THEY WERE ABLE TO THREAD THE WIRE AND THEN INTRODUCER WITH NO ISSUES, HOWEVER THEY WENT TO THREAD PICC AND MET RESISTANCE. NURSE MANIPULATED THE PICC BACK AND FORTH A FEW TIMES TO SEE IF THE PICC WOULD PASS RESISTANCE BUT IT DID NOT. AFTER NOT BEING ABLE TO THREAD THE PICC HE THEN REMOVED THE DEVICE AND WHEN TO FLUSH THE LINE WITH THE STY-LET STILL IN DEVICE, AT THAT POINT HE SAW A PIECE OF THE STY-LET COME OUT OF THE PICC THAT HAD BROKEN OFF.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10993396 ↗InjuryDec 11, 2020Break; Entrapment of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FOREIGN OBJECT FOUND IN PT. ON CHEST X-RAY. INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGIST CONSULTED AND REMOVED THE OBJECT AND SENT IT TO PATHOLOGY. APPEARS TO BE A SMALL PIECE OF WIRE. PATIENT HAD A BARD PICC LINE INSERTED. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 10993251 ↗InjuryNov 19, 2020Break
IT WAS REPORTED: "WE HAVE HAD A PIECE OF A GUIDEWIRE THAT BROKE OFF IN A PATIENT" "X-RAY SHOWED AN OBJECT IN THE CHEST. IR REMOVED IT ON (B)(6) 2020. UPON REMOVAL, THE OBJECT APPEARS TO BE THE STYLET OF PICC LINE INSERTED ON (B)(6) 2020. "
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 10870873 ↗
Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7617405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,708 reports
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7655405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,536 reports
- PowerPICC Catheter 3174118Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall402 reports
- L-Cath™ S/L PICC S/L 26GA (1.9F) x 30cmArgon Medical Devices, Inc. · Catheter,Intravascular,Therapeutic,Long-Term Greater Than 30 Days2 recalls245 reports
- PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter 1194108DBard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 recalls216 reports
- Broviac 0600520Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall265 reports
- Groshong® Catheter 7717405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days279 reports
- PowerPICC Catheter 3275118Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days272 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page