ULTRASCORE US35130512Recalls & reported problems
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · ULTRASCORE™ Focused Force PTA Balloon 5mm x 120mm, 130cm catheter · Class 2
All models of ULTRASCORE (61)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741116780), received between Jun 27, 2019 and Feb 9, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Break3
- Material Deformation3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Injury1
- Stenosis1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Break; Difficult to Remove
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) PROCEDURE USING THE ULTRASCORE 035 BALLOON CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE WIRE ALLEGEDLY DETACHED FROM BALLOON. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24290363 ↗MalfunctionJan 30, 2026Break; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) PROCEDURE USING THE ULTRAVERSE 035 BALLOON CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON CATHETER ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO REMOVE FORM THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24219173 ↗MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Break
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) PROCEDURE USING THE ULTRASCORE 035 BALLOON CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON GUIDEWIRE ALLEGEDLY DETACHED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER BALLOON. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24000418 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2024Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE CALCIFIED LESION, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY GOT STUCK IN THE SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON GOT STUCK IN THE GUIDEWIRE. REPORTEDLY, THE SHEATH NEEDED TO BE REMOVED WITH THE BALLOON STUCK INSIDE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20115636 ↗MalfunctionMar 5, 2024Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO BE RETRIEVED FROM THE SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY GOT SNAPPED AND REMAINED INSIDE THE SHEATH. REPORTEDLY, THE RESIDUAL CATHETER ALLEGEDLY SLIPPED OUT SLIGHTLY UPON WITHDRAWING THE SHEATH. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18836741 ↗MalfunctionNov 8, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Leak/Splash; Burst Container or Vessel; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY VIA THE LEFT FEMORAL ARTERY CROSSOVER APPROACH, THE SHAFT OF THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY SEEMED TO BE BURST DURING THE SECOND INFLATION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT UPON INVESTIGATION, A LEAKAGE AT THE SHAFT WHERE THE SHAFT WAS CONNECTED TO THE PRESSURE SYRINGE, WAS NOTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18090772 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE WITH A FOCUSED FORCE PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY BALLOON, IMAGING DEMONSTRATED GRADE D DISSECTION. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL ONE DAY POST INDEX PROCEDURE. THE SUBJECT COMPLETED THE STUDY.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 11257525 ↗InjuryApr 13, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL STUDY TRIAL, A FOCUSED FORCE PTA BALLOON WAS USED TO TREAT THE LEFT FEMORAL ARTERY, APPROXIMATELY 11-MONTH AND 15 DAYS THE FIRST PATIENT EXPERIENCED 80% STENOSIS OF TARGET LESION AND REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT, APPROXIMATELY 14 DAYS THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SECOND 50% STENOSIS OF TARGET LESION AND REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED. THE CURRENT PATIENT STATUS WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Stenosis
MAUDE report 9955504 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL, THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE SUPERIAL FEMORAL ARTERY WITH A FOCUSED FORCED PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER, FOLLOWING USE OF THE STUDY DEVICE, STENT WAS PLACED FOR ELASTIC RECOIL IN MID SFA.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8742132 ↗
Other Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring devices
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring41 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring31 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring28 reports
- 2cm Peripheral Cutting Balloon® M001PCB8020900Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring18 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2105-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- ULTRASCORE US14150530Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring15 reports
- ULTRASCORE US3513058Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring14 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page