ULTRASCORE US3513068Recalls & reported problems
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · ULTRASCORE™ Focused Force PTA Balloon 6mm x 80mm, 130cm catheter · Class 2
All models of ULTRASCORE (61)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741116865), received between Aug 7, 2018 and Feb 20, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Failure to Advance1
- Leak/Splash1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- Vascular Dissection3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Occlusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 20, 2024Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE SEVERELY CALCIFIED STENOSIS OF A POPLITEAL ARTERY VIA THE LEFT GROIN, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY DIFFICULT TO BE REMOVED AND HAD VERY HARD RESISTANCE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE WIRES ALLEGEDLY DETACHED FROM THE BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18738972 ↗MalfunctionJan 23, 2024Leak/Splash; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Leak/Splash; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE LEFT LEG VIA RIGHT FEMORALIS COMMUNIS, THE FLUID ALLEGEDLY DROPPED OUT BETWEEN THE CONNECTION HUB AND THE CATHETER WHEN PRESSURE WAS APPLIED TO THE BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18562424 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT FOLLOWING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE PROXIMAL 1/3 AND MID 1/3 OF THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY WITH A FOCUSED FORCE PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER, DISSECTION WAS IDENTIFIED WHICH REQUIRED PLACEMENT OF A STENT. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 8272515 ↗InjuryNov 29, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE WITH A FOCUSED FORCE PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER, VESSEL DISSECTION WAS IDENTIFIED AFTER THREE INFLATIONS IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. REPORTEDLY, THE DISSECTION WAS TREATED WITH A DRUG ELUTING STENT. THE EVENT WAS CONSIDERED TO BE RESOLVED. THE SUBJECT WAS DISCHARGED ONE DAY AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Occlusion; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 8118464 ↗InjuryAug 7, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL, THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE WITH A FOCUSED FORCE PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER, VESSEL DISSECTION WAS IDENTIFIED AFTER INFLATION IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. REPORTEDLY, THE DISSECTION WAS TREATED WITH A NON DRUG COATED PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER AND THE EVENT WAS CONSIDERED TO BE RESOLVED.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 7760420 ↗
Other Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring devices
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring41 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring31 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring28 reports
- 2cm Peripheral Cutting Balloon® M001PCB8020900Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring18 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2105-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- ULTRASCORE US14150530Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring15 reports
- ULTRASCORE US3513058Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring14 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page