Skip to content

Magic3 Go Male Catheter with SureGrip 53820GRecalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Magic3 Go 20 Fr Male Catheter with SureGrip · Class 2

All models of Magic3 Go Male Catheter with SureGrip (6)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741136993), received between Mar 25, 2019 and Aug 2, 2021 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Product Quality Problem” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Apr 20, 2023Class IIOpen, Classified

    Some catheters had a manufacturing defect where the clear resealing label separating from the product foil pouch, resulting in a possible opening into the product packaging that could impact product sterility.

    Z-1699-2023 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Product Quality Problem2
  • Defective Device1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Improper Chemical Reaction1
  • Inaccurate Flow Rate1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 2, 2021Improper Chemical Reaction; Improper Chemical Reaction

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INTERMITTENT CATHETER WERE DRY, HERE AND THERE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12258970 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2020Inaccurate Flow Rate; Inaccurate Flow Rate

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WOULD NOT VOID ANYTHING BUT DONT KNOW HOW FAR THE CATHETER SHOULD BE INSERTED. THE PATIENT GOT A PINCH SORT OF PAIN BUT HAD NO BLEEDING AND WANTED SMALLER SAMPLES.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 10192135 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2019Product Quality Problem; Defective Device; Product Quality Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT SAID THE CATHETERS WERE NOT LUBRICATED ENOUGH, AND HE HAD TO ADD STERILE WATER TO THEM.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9192334 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 25, 2019Difficult to Insert; Product Quality Problem; Product Quality Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MAGIC 3 CATHETER HAD A LACK OF LUBRICITY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8447480 ↗

Other CATHETER, STRAIGHT devices

All CATHETER, STRAIGHT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page