Peripheral Catheter Insertion Kit F318088PTRecalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PowerGlide 18Ga, 8cm · Class 2
All models of Peripheral Catheter Insertion Kit (54)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741140655), received between Feb 14, 2018 and Mar 24, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Activation Problem1
- Complete Blockage1
- Component Missing1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Material Deformation1
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- Foreign Body In Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 24, 2026Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CLAMP ON THE EXTENSION TUBING IN THE KIT WAS JAMMED INTO THE TAPE THAT COMES WITH THE DRESSING PACKAGING. THE TUBING WAS SO KINKED THAT EVEN WITH ATTEMPTS TO SMOOTH OUT, IT WOULD NOT GIVE BLOOD RETURN. A SECOND KIT WAS OPENED TO USE NEW TUBING. NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24675624 ↗MalfunctionJul 10, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED, ACCESSED VEIN AND PUSHED BUTTON TO RETRACT NEEDLE AND WHEN SEPARATING CATHETER HUB FROM HOUSING NOTED THAT NEEDLE WAS MISSING. NEEDLE SEPARATED FROM GREEN HOUSING AND WAS LEFT INSIDE CATHETER HUB AND PATIENT. VAT WENT TO REMOVE NEEDLE FROM CATHETER AND MET RESISTANCE, CATHETER WAS PULED BACK UNTIL NEEDLE WAS FREE TO BE REMOVED WITH NO RESISTANCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22473387 ↗InjuryApr 26, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED VIS MEDWATCH THAT ULTRASOUND GUIDED POWERGLIDE MIDLINE (18 G 8 CM) INSERTION WAS ATTEMPTED. STERILE PROCEDURE PER PROTOCOL AND NEEDLE TIP SEEN WITHIN VESSEL. GUIDEWIRE DEPLOYED WITHOUT COMPLICATION; HOWEVER, CATHETER WOULD NOT GLIDE OVER WIRE. AFTER SECOND FAILED ATTEMPT OF CATHETER GLIDING OVER GUIDEWIRE, INSERTER DECIDED TO REMOVE ENTIRE MIDLINE CATHETER. NEEDLE REMOVED AND SAFETY DEPLOYED WITHOUT COMPLICATION. UPON REMOVING CATHETER, INSERTER MET RESISTANCE ONCE APPROXIMATELY 6 CM OF CATHETER REMOVED FROM PATIENT'S ARM. CATHETER WAS SECURED TO PATIENT'S ARM WITH TEGADERM AND A CHEST/ARM XRAY WAS COMPLETED. CATHETER AND GUIDEWIRE REMOVED. ADDITIONAL CHEST/ARM XRAY COMPLETED AFTER REMOVAL. GUIDEWIRE APPEARS TO HAVE COME LOSE FROM DEVICE AND CATHETER TIP NOT INTACT. THE CATHETER WAS 7 CM UPON REMOVAL. APPROXIMATELY 1 CM OF RETAINED MIDLINE CATHETER IN PATIENT'S LEFT ARM. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 21915644 ↗MalfunctionFeb 2, 2023Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER, 'POWERGLIDE MALFUNCTION NOTICED. WHEN REMOVING NEEDLE, NEEDLE STAYED IN VEIN WITH THE CATHETER. THE POWERGLIDE WAS ASSEMBLED INCORRECTLY, NEEDLE RETRACTED HAS BLUNT END NOT BEVELED.'
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16284564 ↗MalfunctionJun 9, 2021Activation Problem; Activation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED "UPON WHAT APPEARED TO BE A ROUTINE, STRAIGHTFORWARD INSERTION, THE NEEDLE DID NOT SAFETY PROPERLY. NO PATIENT HARM, NO CLINICIAN HARM, CATHETER PLACED SUCCESSFULLY AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11971246 ↗InjuryAug 21, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED "PATIENT WAS SENT TO SURGERY THIS MORNING (7/28) AS THERE WAS A POWERGLIDE ON (7/25) THAT "BROKE OFF" INTO PATIENT AND THEY NEEDED TO GET IT OUT. DEVICE WAS THROWN AWAY BUT CATHETER THAT WAS FOUND IN ARM WAS SENT TO PATHOLOGY AFTER SURGERY." PICC WAS PLACED IN RIGHT UPPER ARM AND SECURED WITH STATLOCK.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 10435991 ↗MalfunctionJun 29, 2018Component Missing; Physical Resistance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT "RN ATTEMPTED TO PLACE POWERGLIDE TO RIGHT CEPHALIC VEIN. THE VEIN WAS ACCESSED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY, WIRE WENT IN SMOOTHLY, CATHETER INSERTED HALFWAY WITH RESISTANCE MET AT THAT POINT. WITHDREW DEVICE FROM CATHETER AND IMMEDIATELY NOTED SMALL WIRE AT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS MISSING. RN IMMEDIATELY REMOVED THE CATHETER AND FLUSHED WITH NORMAL SALINE TO SEE THE WIRE WAS IN THE CATHETER. NO WIRE NOTED. A CALL WAS PLACED TO PHYSICIAN WITH ORDERS RECEIVED FOR STAT CHEST X-RAY AND ULTRASOUND OF RIGHT UPPER EXTREMITY. XRAY AND ULTRASOUND COMPLETED WITH NO ABNORMALITIES AND NO WIRE NOTED."
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7650188 ↗MalfunctionJun 29, 2018Complete Blockage; Occlusion Within Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER WAS INSERTED AND SOON THEREAFTER CATHETER WAS CLOGGED, UNUSABLE AND REMOVED. THIS IS WHEN RN NOTED A WIRE IN THE ACTUAL CATHETER, THIS CAUSED THE LINE TO BE OCCLUDED. X-RAY DONE TO MAKE SURE A PIECE WAS WIRE WAS NOT DISLODGED AND GONE INTO PATIENT. NO FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS REPORTED TO BE RETAINED IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7650186 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2018Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NURSE PLACED THE POWERGLIDE PRO, AND UPON REMOVING THE HOUSING, SHE NOTED A 'FISHING LINE' LEFT OUTSIDE OF THE CATHETER. SHE WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE IT. NURSE STATES "THE ENTIRE CATHETER WAS REMOVED, AND DUE TO THE PATIENT'S POOR VEINS, ANOTHER PLACEMENT WAS NOT ATTEMPTED." NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7271058 ↗
Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days devices
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382523Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days660 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382533Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls527 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306546Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 death608 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard Shielded IV Catheter 381823Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, short-term less than 30 days582 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 381423Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall528 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382544Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall437 reports
- BD Nexiva, BD Q-Syte 383536Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls374 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306547Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls1 death331 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page