PowerPICC Provena SOLO S1295108FD5Recalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter Placement Kit · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PowerPICC Provena SOLO (19)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741155215), received between Oct 5, 2018 and May 27, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- May 21, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified
Due to lidocaine ampoules being manufactured under deficient manufacturing practices by manufacturer, lidocaine ampoules are currently being recalled by supplier.
Z-2666-2026 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Material Frayed3
- Material Fragmentation2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Chest Pain1
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Dyspnea1
- Insufficient Information1
- Nausea1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 27, 2026Material Frayed
IT WAS REPORTED BY CUSTOMER THAT RESISTANCE MET WHILE RETRACTING GUIDEWIRE. WHEN REMOVED, THE WIRE WAS UNCOILED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25300788 ↗MalfunctionJan 26, 2023Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF CATH LAB THAT A LONG COILED HAIR WAS FOUND WITHIN A STERILIZED PICC KIT. IT WAS STATED THE KIT WAS NOT USED ON A PATIENT. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16250119 ↗InjuryDec 7, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE CUSTOMER IS EXPERIENCING DVTS WITH A PARTICULAR LOT NUMBER. THE LINE WAS REMOVED AND PATIENT TREATED. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 15932631 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THE PICC LINE HAD A HOLE. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14053258 ↗MalfunctionOct 21, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED PICC NURSE HAD TROUBLE INSERTING THE DILATOR. WHEN SHE PULLED IT OUT IT HAD FOLDED UP ON ITSELF. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12672397 ↗InjuryOct 13, 2021Material Frayed; Material Frayed
IT WAS REPORTED VIA MS&S "CUSTOMER CALLED TO REQUEST EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS FOR A POWERPICC. SHE REPORTED THAT THEY HAD THE TIP OF THE STYLET BREAK OFF IN A PATIENT AND LODGE IN THE RIGHT VENTRICLE ON (B)(6). SHE REPORTED THIS TO MED WATCH. THE FOREIGN BODY WAS DISCOVERED TWO WEEKS AFTER WHEN THE PATIENT CAME BACK TO THE HOSPITAL FOR A DIFFERENT REASON, BUT A CT WAS PERFORMED AND THE STYLET TIP WAS DISCOVERED AT THAT POINT. SHE REPORTED THAT PATIENT DID NOT SUFFER ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS, OTHER THEN HAVING TO HAVE A PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE TIP." MS&S RESPONSE: "I PROVIDED THE PROVENA IFU AND FORWARDED THE CASE TO PRODUCT COMPLAINTS." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 09/28/2021 "DATE OF INSERTION: (B)(6) 2021. THE PICC INSERTION NURSE REPORTS THE PICC LINE INSERTION WAS UNEVENTFUL. SHE INSERTED THE PICC IN THE LEFT ARM DUE TO PATIENT HAVING OSTEOMYELITIS, GANGRENE OF RIGHT THUMB AND NOTED SWELLING UP THE RIGHT FOREARM. THE PICC LINE WAS NOT TRIMMED AT ALL DUE TO EXTRA LENGTH NEEDED FOR LEFT SIDED PICC. PROCEDURE TOOK APPROXIMATELY 25 TO 30 MINUTES AND PROPER PLACEMENT WAS CONFIRMED BY RADIOLOGIST. THE RADIOLOGIST DID NOT SEE THE FOREIGN BODY ON INITIAL CONFIRM PLACEMENT X-RAY. HE WAS LOOK
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 12628154 ↗InjurySep 7, 2021Material Fragmentation
PICC INSERTION ON (B)(6) 2021. X-RAY OF PICC LINE PLACEMENT PERFORMED AND NO FOREIGN BODY NOTES. PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED HOME WITH ON (B)(6) 2021. RETURNED TO EMERGENCY ROOM WITH INTRACTABLE NAUSEA AND VOMITING. SHE ALSO HAD REPORTED SOME SOB AND CHEST PAIN FOR PAST SEVERAL DAYS PRIOR. CT SCAN ORDERED OF CHEST AND ABDOMEN. A FOREIGN BODY NOTED IN HEART ON CT SCAN. A CHEST X-RAY WAS OBTAINED AND CONFIRMED FOREIGN BODY IN RIGHT VENTRICLE OF HEART. HEART CAUTERIZATIONS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE FOREIGN BODY. CARDIOLOGIST WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE FOREIGN BODY WHICH IS BELIEVED TO BE A PIECE OF THE PICC INSERTION GUIDEWIRE. THE FOREIGN BODY APPROXIMATELY 1 TO 1 1/2 INCHES IN LENGTH. FOREIGN BODY WAS PLACED IN A CONTAINER AND TRANSPORTED TO LABORATORY FOR FURTHER INSPECTION. FDA SAFETY REPORT ID # (B)(4).
Patient problems: Chest Pain; Dyspnea; Foreign Body In Patient; Nausea; Vomiting
MAUDE report 12438741 ↗InjuryMar 18, 2020Material Frayed; Material Frayed
IT WAS REPORTED PER RECEIVED MEDWATCH "PICC INSERTION WITH SHERLOCK 3CG PLACEMENT VERIFIED LINE IN SUPERIOR VENA CAVA. HAD SOME DIFFICULTY GETTING PICC LINE TO DROP IN SUPERIOR VENA CAVA PRIOR. IT APPEARED TO BE GOING UP INTO INTERNAL JUGULAR AND CIRCLING PER MONITOR. ONCE IN PLACE I ATTEMPTED TO PULL WIRE OUT AND HEARD A POP EXAMINED WIRE IT APPEARED BROKEN. PULLED PICC LINE OUT HOPING WIRE MAY STILL BE IN CATHETER AND CHECKED FOR THE ENTIRE 40CM LINE WAS INTACT. ORDERED FOR STAT CHEST X-RAY AND STAT CTA (COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY) TO BE SAFE. STARTED PIV FOR CTA AND IT CONFIRMED 3.7CM WIRE LEFT INPATIENT RIGHT SUBCLAVIAN VEIN. INFORMED HOUSE SUPERVISOR, PRIMARY MD, IR DIRECTOR AND IR MD. SAVED PICC LINE AND WIRE FOR REVIEW AND IR RETRIEVED A 3.7CM WIRE FROM PATIENT".
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 9848487 ↗InjuryFeb 22, 2019Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE RN INSERTED A PICC IN A PATIENT AND A PIECE OF THE 3CG STYLET TIP BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENTS ARM. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE PIECE OF WIRE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 8363171 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2018Break; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PLACEMENT THE TIP OF THE 3CG WIRE BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. IR DETECTED IT UNDER FLURO. PATIENT TRANSFERRED TO VASCULAR SURGEON FOR REMOVAL OF 3CG STYLET TIP. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MS&S STATED, "FROM [TERRITORY MANAGER'S] DESCRIPTION OF THE EVENT IT SOUNDED LIKE THE INSERTER HIT AN OBSTRUCTION AND KEPT TRYING TO PUSH THE PICC THROUGH THE OBSTRUCTION AND THEN HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PICC." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION STATED, "THE STYLET FRAGMENT WAS REMOVED." ON (B)(6) 2018 PER MEDWATCH: THE PATIENT PRESENTED FOR PLACEMENT OF A PICC. NURSING STAFF REPORTED THAT DURING THE INSERTION PROCESS, THEY DISCOVERED THAT A PORTION OF THE WIRE HAD BROKEN OFF AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. AFTER CONSULTATION WITH RADIOLOGIST AND PATIENT'S PHYSICIAN, THE DECISION WAS MADE TO TRANSFER PATIENT TO HOSPITAL TO HAVE THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE WIRE REMOVED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 8077767 ↗MalfunctionOct 5, 2018Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLACEMENT OF A PICC IN THE RIGHT UPPER ARM WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. UPON INSPECTION OF THE DEVICE IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STYLET WAS BROKEN. ANOTHER PICC WAS SUCCESSFULLY PLACE IN THE LEFT UPPER ARM. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: FACILITY REPORTED A "HARD" INSERTION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7939560 ↗
Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7617405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,708 reports
- Groshong NXT ClearVue Catheter 7655405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 deaths1,536 reports
- PowerPICC Catheter 3174118Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall402 reports
- L-Cath™ S/L PICC S/L 26GA (1.9F) x 30cmArgon Medical Devices, Inc. · Catheter,Intravascular,Therapeutic,Long-Term Greater Than 30 Days2 recalls245 reports
- PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter 1194108DBard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days2 recalls216 reports
- Broviac 0600520Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days1 recall265 reports
- Groshong® Catheter 7717405Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days279 reports
- PowerPICC Catheter 3275118Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days272 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page