Skip to content

GlidePath 5304150Recalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · GlidePath 10F Long-Term Dialysis Catheter, 15 cm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GlidePath (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741187308), received between Jan 26, 2023 and Mar 12, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture4
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Discolored1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Fracture; Difficult to Insert; Material Separation; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Fracture; Difficult to Insert; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE VALVE OF THE PEEL AWAY INTRODUCER WAS ALLEGEDLY BROKEN OFF. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS ALLEGEDLY DIFFICULT TO INSERT THROUGH THE PEEL AWAY SHEATH. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18885162 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 20, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE MONTHS AND TWENTY DAYS POST DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT, THE CLAMP OF VENOUS LIMB OF THE HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER ALLEGEDLY BROKE. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS REPAIRED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17778710 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIME POST DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE CLIP OF VENOUS LIMB OF HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER ALLEGEDLY BROKE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16674175 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2023Material Discolored; Fracture; Material Deformation; Material Discolored; Fracture; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS POST DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT, THE CATHETER ALLEGEDLY CRACKED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16245229 ↗

Other Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted devices

All Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page