ENDOTAK RELIANCE® G 0187Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Steroid-Eluting Bipolar Pace/Sense and Defibrillation Lead · Class 3 · Implant
All models of ENDOTAK RELIANCE G (12)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00802526531217), received between Nov 7, 2016 and Nov 21, 2022 — classified as 5 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “High impedance” (5 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P910073); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Recalls naming this device
- Jul 24, 2025Class IOpen, Classified
Affected lead models may experience gradually rising LVSI measurements in association with calcification of the defibrillation lead coils. The issue may lead to early lead replacement. Most serious harm is death or need for cardiac resuscitation.
Z-2325-2025 · Root cause: Component design/selection · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- High impedance5
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Device Sensing Problem1
- Off-Label Use1
- Over-Sensing1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Sepsis2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Electric Shock1
- No Code Available1
- Shock from Patient Lead(s)1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 21, 2022High impedance; High impedance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE NON BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DEVICE EXPLANT PROCEDURE, THIS RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) LEAD WAS FOUND EXHIBITING HIGH SHOCK IMPEDANCES OUT OF RANGE. TECHNICAL SERVICES (TS) RECOMMENDED TO PERFORM A DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD (DFT) TEST, NONETHELESS, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO NOT PERFORM IT. A NEW IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) WAS IMPLANTED AND CONNECTED TO THIS RV LEAD. THE RV LEAD REMAINS IN SERVICE AND NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Electric Shock; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Shock from Patient Lead(s)
MAUDE report 15839527 ↗MalfunctionMay 27, 2022High impedance; High impedance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING REPLACEMENT OF THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR THE SHOCK IMPEDANCE OF THE PROXIMAL COIL OF THE RIGHT VENTRICULAR LEAD AS GREATER THAN 200 OHMS. THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO PROGRAM A SINGLE COIL CONFIGURATION USING THE DISTAL COIL THAT HAD NORMAL IMPEDANCE OF 85 OHMS. THE RV LEAD REMAINS IMPLANTED AND NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14529257 ↗InjuryNov 2, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) LEAD WAS PART OF A SYSTEM REVISION DUE TO INFECTION WITH SEPSIS. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTICS. THE DEVICE WAS SENT TO HISTOLOGY DEPARTMENT. THERE WERE NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED. THE RV LEAD WAS EXPLANTED.
Patient problems: Sepsis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12735596 ↗InjuryJul 2, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) LEAD WAS FOUND OUT TO BE DISLODGED. THE LEAD WAS EXPLANTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10226427 ↗MalfunctionApr 12, 2019High impedance; Off-Label Use; High impedance; Off-Label Use
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE DEVICE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE WHEN THE RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) LEAD WAS CONNECTED TO THE NEW IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) HIGH OUT OF RANGE SHOCK IMPEDANCES MEASURING GREATER THAN 125 OHMS WERE EXHIBITED. WHEN THE SHOCK LEAD VECTOR WAS PROGRAMMED DISTAL COIL TO CAN THE IMPEDANCES WERE OUT OF RANGE. THE PROXIMAL TERMINAL PIN WAS CONNECTED TO THE DISTAL PORT AND THE DISTAL TERMINAL PIN WAS CONNECTED TO THE PROXIMAL PORT. WHEN THE LEADS WERE REVERSED IN THE HEADER THE SHOCK IMPEDANCES WERE WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES (TS) DISCUSSED SINCE THE DEVICE IS IMPLANTED IN THE ABDOMEN THIS MAY BE A WORKABLE VECTOR, HOWEVER, THEY RECOMMENDED PERFORMING DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD (DFT) TESTING TO CONFIRM. SUBSEQUENTLY, DFT TESTING WAS PERFORMED AND THE PATIENT'S RHYTHM WAS SUCCESSFULLY CONVERTED. THIS ICD WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED AND REMAINS IN SERVICE. THE RV LEAD ALSO REMAINS IN SERVICE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8510860 ↗InjuryFeb 7, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS LEFT VENTRICULAR (LV) LEAD WAS PART OF A SYSTEM REVISION DUE TO INFECTION. THERE WERE NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED. THE LV LEAD WAS EXPLANTED.
Patient problems: Sepsis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8314734 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2018High impedance; Over-Sensing; Device Sensing Problem; High impedance; Over-Sensing; Device Sensing Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR (CRT-D) AND RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) LEAD EXHIBITED HIGH OUT-OF-RANGE SHOCK IMPEDANCE OF GREATER THAN 200 OHMS. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES (TS) RECOMMENDED BRINGING THE PATIENT INTO THE CLINIC FOR FURTHER EVALUATION INCLUDING ISOMETRICS. THIS PRODUCT REMAINS IN SERVICE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8002688 ↗MalfunctionNov 7, 2016High impedance; High impedance
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS LEAD AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURE'S DEVICE DISPLAYED HIGH SHOCK IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES DIRECTED THE CALLER TO THE DEVICE MANUFACTURE'S TECHNICAL SERVICES. THE LOCAL BOSTON SCIENTIFIC FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT HAVE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. THE LEAD REMAINS IN SERVICE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6082433 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P910073. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2326-2025 · Jul 24, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedENDOTAK RELIANCE G/SG with 4-SITE Connector, transvenous defibrillation lead, Permanent Defibrillator Electrodes; Model Nos. 0282, 0283, 0285, 0286, 0292, 0293, 0295, 0296
- Z-2327-2025 · Jul 24, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedRELIANCE 4-FRONT, endocardial cardioversion/defibrillation and pace/sense lead, Permanent Defibrillator Electrodes; Model Nos. 0654, 0655, 0657, 0658, 0682, 0683, 0685, 0686, 0692,
Other Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT) devices
- EMBLEM™ MRI S-ICD A219Boston Scientific Corporation · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)2 recalls36 deaths15,404 reports
- EMBLEM™ S-ICD A209Boston Scientific Corporation · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)1 recall7 deaths6,788 reports
- EMBLEM™ S-ICD 3501Boston Scientific Corporation · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)7 deaths4,936 reports
- Cobalt™ XT DR MRI SureScan™ DDPA2D4Medtronic, Inc. · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)3 recalls30 deaths1,603 reports
- ENDOTAK RELIANCE® G 0185Boston Scientific Corporation · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)9 deaths1,632 reports
- VIGILANT™ EL ICD DR D233Boston Scientific Corporation · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)9 deaths1,563 reports
- Evera MRI™ XT DR SureScan® DDMB1D4Medtronic, Inc. · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)1 recall35 deaths1,426 reports
- Durata™ 7122St. Jude Medical, Inc. · Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT)27 deaths1,377 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page