iFuse TORQ Implant System 10060TRecalls & reported problems
Si-Bone Inc. · 10.0mm x 60mm iFuse-TORQ · Class 2 · Implant
All models of iFuse TORQ Implant System (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00810055520084), received between Nov 2, 2021 and Nov 2, 2021 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 21, 2026Open, Classified
The pelvic fixation screws failed to meet acceptance criteria for tube packaging seal integrity testing; therefore, sterility assurance cannot be ensured.
Z-0146-2027 · Root cause: Packaging · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Undesired Nerve Stimulation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 2, 2021Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
THE PATIENT HAD RIGHT SIDE SI JOINT ARTHRODESIS IN (B)(6) 2021 WHERE TWO SCREW TYPE IMPLANTS WERE INSTALLED. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF RADICULAR PAIN FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE INFERIOR POSITIONED IMPLANT WAS IMPINGING ON THE NEUROFORAMEN CAUSING RADICULAR PAIN. IN (B)(6) 2021, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A REVISION PROCEDURE WHERE THE INFERIOR POSITIONED IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SHORTER IMPLANT OF THE SAME TYPE USING THE EXPLANT VOID. NO OTHER PREEXISTING IMPLANTS WERE ADJUSTED OR REMOVED. THE STATUS OF THE PATIENT FOLLOWING THE REVISION PROCEDURE IS NOT KNOWN.
Patient problems: Undesired Nerve Stimulation
MAUDE report 12738841 ↗
Other Sacroiliac Joint Fixation devices
- Firebird SI Fusion 18-1035SPOrthofix US LLC · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall1 report
- iFuse TORQ Implant System 10065TSi-Bone Inc. · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall1 report
- Firebird SI Fusion 18-2050SPOrthofix US LLC · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall0 reports
- Firebird SI Fusion 18-1065SPOrthofix US LLC · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall0 reports
- Firebird SI Fusion 18-2065SPOrthofix US LLC · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall0 reports
- Firebird SI Fusion 18-2045SPOrthofix US LLC · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall0 reports
- iFuse TORQ Implant System 10055TSi-Bone Inc. · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall0 reports
- Firebird SI Fusion 18-2025SPOrthofix US LLC · Sacroiliac Joint Fixation1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page