Skip to content

iFuse TORQ Implant System 10065TRecalls & reported problems

Si-Bone Inc. · 10.0mm x 65mm iFuse-TORQ · Class 2 · Implant

All models of iFuse TORQ Implant System (9)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00810055520091), received between Jan 5, 2022 and Jan 5, 2022 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 21, 2026Open, Classified

    The pelvic fixation screws failed to meet acceptance criteria for tube packaging seal integrity testing; therefore, sterility assurance cannot be ensured.

    Z-0146-2027 · Root cause: Packaging · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Undesired Nerve Stimulation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 5, 2022Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    THE PATIENT HAD BILATERAL SI JOINT ARTHRODESIS IN (B)(6) 2021 WHERE TWO SCREW TYPE IMPLANTS WERE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF LEFT SIDE RADICULAR PAIN FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE LEFT SIDE INFERIOR POSITIONED IMPLANT WAS IMPINGING ON THE NEUROFORAMEN CAUSING RADICULAR PAIN. ONE WEEK AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A REVISION PROCEDURE WHERE THE LEFT SIDE INFERIOR POSITIONED IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SHORTER IMPLANT OF THE SAME TYPE. NO OTHER PREEXISTING IMPLANTS WERE ADJUSTED OR REMOVED. THE PATIENT'S PAIN SYMPTOMS RESOLVED FOLLOWING THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Undesired Nerve Stimulation

    MAUDE report 13173026 ↗

Other Sacroiliac Joint Fixation devices

All Sacroiliac Joint Fixation devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page