Skip to content

Ruby XL Coil System RBYXL2455-ARecalls & reported problems

Penumbra, Inc. · Ruby Coil XL, 24mm x 55cm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Ruby XL Coil System (14)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00810169721612), received between Sep 22, 2026 and Sep 22, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 22, 2026Premature Separation

    The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastric varices using a Packing Coil XL, Ruby XL, and a non-Penumbra diagnostic catheter. While advancing a Packing Coil XL to the target location, the physician encountered resistance. Upon retraction, the embolization coil unintentionally detached within the diagnostic catheter. The physician subsequently used saline to flush the detached Packing Coil XL into the vessel.While advancing the a Ruby XL, resistance was encountered again. The Ruby XL was retracted and it unintentionally detached within the diagnostic catheter. The physician subsequently used saline to flush the detached Ruby XL into the vessel.The procedure was completed using a new non-Penumbra coil and the same diagnostic catheter. There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50852406 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page