Skip to content

Azur Detachable Framing Coil 45-680820Recalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · Azur · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Azur Detachable Framing Coil (7)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00810170017742), received between Mar 22, 2019 and Jan 14, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component4
  • Device-Device Incompatibility2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 14, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Premature Separation; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Premature Separation

    AS REPORTED: DURING SPLENIC ARTERY ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED CONSIDERABLE RESISTANCE AS HE ADVANCED THIS COIL THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER. THIS WAS NOT THE FIRST COIL OR LAST COIL TO BE ADVANCED THROUGH THIS SYSTEM. THE PHYSICIAN RECAPTURED THE COIL TO FLUSH THE SYSTEM AND TRY AGAIN. THE COIL WAS RETRACTED INTO THE COIL SHEATH, AFTER THE COIL WAS APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY INTO THE COIL SHEATH. THE COIL DETACHED FROM THE PUSHER WIRE, LEAVING THE COIL HALF INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER AND HALFWAY OUT OF IT. THE COIL WAS PULLED FROM THE CATHETER AND DISCARDED. ADDITIONAL COILS WERE ADVANCED AFTER THIS POINT WITH NO FURTHER RESISTANCE ISSUES. THE COIL MUST HAVE BROKE SOME TIME AFTER THE PROXIMAL END WAS IN THE PROTECTIVE SHEATH BECAUSE WHEN THE COIL WAS PULLED OUT AND AWAY FROM THE MICROCATHETER HUB, THE COIL REMAINED HALF INSIDE AND HALF OUTSIDE OF THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY 10- 15 CM OF COIL OUTSIDE OF THE MICROCATHETER, ALLOWING FOR THE PHYSICIAN TO GRAB IT WITH HIS HAND AND REMOVE IT FROM THE MICROCATHETER NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21153252 ↗
  • InjuryApr 20, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE FOR A PSEUDO-ANEURYSM, THE DELIVERY PUSHER OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT SEPARATED INTO TWO PIECES. THE PHYSICIAN FLUSHED THE COIL INTO POSITION AND ATTEMPTED TO SNARE THE PART OF THE PUSHER STILL INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. PART OF THE COIL WAS REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY, HOWEVER A PORTION REMAINS WITHIN THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL FLUORO TIME WAS NEEDED TO TRY TO RETRIEVE THE COIL. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11691608 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PORTAL VEIN EMBOLIZATION, AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER DURING RETRACTION. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11600697 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 22, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE COIL IN THE CATHETER. DURING REMOVAL, THE COIL DETACHED INSIDE THE CATHETER. THE COIL WAS REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY TOGETHER WITH THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8445502 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 22, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE COIL IN THE CATHETER. DURING REMOVAL, THE COIL DETACHED INSIDE THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8445444 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page