HydroSoft Helical 100206H2HS-V-NRecalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant
All models of HydroSoft Helical (21)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00811425020166), received between May 8, 2019 and Oct 25, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 25, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT BECAME DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE IMPLANT WAS DELIVERED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY TO THE INTENDED TREATMENT SITE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY ON INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9242311 ↗MalfunctionMay 8, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
T WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT, THE LAST COIL WAS FULLY DEPLOYED, HOWEVER IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE LAST 2 LOOPS OF THE COIL COULD BE POSITIONED MORE DESIRABLY. AT THAT POINT, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE COIL HAD DETACHED FROM THE DELIVERY PUSHER WITHIN THE ANEURYSM. NO PORTION OF THE COIL LOOPS WERE PROTRUDING INTO THE PARENT VESSEL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8593174 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page