HydroSoft Helical 100208H2HS-V-NRecalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant
All models of HydroSoft Helical (21)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00811425020173), received between Feb 3, 2021 and Apr 4, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Difficult or Delayed Separation1
- Premature Separation1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Ischemia Stroke1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 4, 2023Separation Failure; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Premature Separation; Separation Failure; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT FOR AN RT P. COM ANEURYSM, THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE CATHETER AFTER MULTIPLE FAILED ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO DETACH IT. THE PHYSICIAN USED THE DELIVERY WIRE TO PUSH THE COIL INTO THE ANEURYSM, LEAVING A SMALL PROTRUDING LOOP AT THE ANEURYSM¿S NECK. THE DOCTOR DECIDED A STENT WAS NOT REQUIRED. THE COIL REMAINS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT. ASPIRIN 500MG IV WAS ADMINISTERED TO THE PATIENT. THE OPERATIVE REPORT WAS REQUESTED AND WAS REPORTED AS NOT AVAILABLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16679069 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING COIL EMBOLIZATION TO TREAT AN ANEURYSM IN THE SUPERIOR CEREBELLAR ARTERY (SCA), THE EMBOLIZATION COIL DETACHED DURING RETRACTION WHILE REPOSITIONING. A STENT WAS DEPLOYED IN THE VERTEBRAL ARTERY TO SECURE THE COIL TAIL TO THE VESSEL WALL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR SEQUELA. THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE "STABLE, GOOD."
Patient problems: Ischemia Stroke; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11276973 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page