AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-4040Recalls & reported problems
The Spectranetics Corporation · Class 2
All models of AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 13
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00813132021405), received between Jun 28, 2018 and Jan 23, 2026 — classified as 13 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture10
- Burst Container or Vessel2
- Entrapment of Device1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient8
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Atherosclerosis1
- Peripheral Vascular Disease1
Recent adverse event reports
The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 23, 2026Entrapment of Device
THE ANGIOSCULPT CATHETER WAS USED IN A PERIPHERAL PROCEDURE. DURING REMOVAL, SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED, NECESSITATING SIMULTANEOUS WITHDRAWAL OF THE ANGIOSCULPT WITH THE GUIDEWIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THIS PRODUCT PROBLEM IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO REMOVAL AS A SYSTEM. THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR HARM IF IT WERE TO RECUR.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24167123 ↗MalfunctionSep 14, 2022Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED TO TREAT THE MID SHUNT. DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 8 ATM FOR 30 SECONDS, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THIS PRODUCT PROBLEM IS BEING SUBMITTED CONSERVATIVELY BECAUSE THE BALLOON RUPTURED BELOW RBP.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15423929 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2022Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED IN A PERIPHERAL LESION. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO 10 ATM FOR 30 SECONDS WITH NO ISSUES. THEN, THE BALLOON WAS PRESSURIZED TO 14 ATM BUT THE VALUE ON THE INDEFLATOR DID NOT GO UP DUE TO A RUPTURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THIS PRODUCT PROBLEM IS BEING SUBMITTED CONSERVATIVELY BECAUSE THE BALLOON RUPTURED AT RBP.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15033608 ↗MalfunctionDec 28, 2021Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED TO TREAT A PERIPHERAL LESION. DURING THE 2ND OR 3RD INFLATION AT 12 ATM, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THIS PRODUCT PROBLEM IS BEING SUBMITTED CONSERVATIVELY BECAUSE THE BALLOON RUPTURED BELOW RBP.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13102068 ↗MalfunctionFeb 4, 2021Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED SFA. DURING THE SECOND INFLATION AT 4 ATM, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11279176 ↗MalfunctionDec 22, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED AND SEVERELY TORTUOUS MID SFA. DURING THE SECOND INFLATION AT 12 ATM, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A COMPETITOR DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11060590 ↗MalfunctionDec 17, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED AND MODERATELY TORTUOUS LESION. DURING THE SECOND INFLATION AT 12 ATM, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11032936 ↗MalfunctionDec 17, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED AND SEVERELY TORTUOUS SFA. DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 14 ATM FOR 1 MINUTE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A COMPETITOR DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11032898 ↗MalfunctionAug 31, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED IN A VASCULAR ACCESS INTERVENTION THERAPY (VAIVT). DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 14 ATM, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10472205 ↗MalfunctionJul 22, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED IN A MODERATELY CALCIFIED POPLITEAL, P2. DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 4-6 ATM, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10311725 ↗MalfunctionJul 10, 2020Material Rupture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Material Rupture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
THE ANGIOSCULPT DEVICE WAS USED IN A SEVERELY CALCIFIED POPLITEAL, P2. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED QUICKLY ABOVE THE RATED BURST PRESSURE (RBP) WHEN THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE USER WAS AWARE THAT THE DEVICE WAS USED OUTSIDE OF THE IFU.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10261496 ↗MalfunctionNov 29, 2018Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
DURING THE THIRD INFLATION AT 16 ATM FOR 30 SECONDS, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. A CUTTING BALLOON CATHETER WAS ALTERNATIVELY USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8115033 ↗MalfunctionJun 28, 2018Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
Patient problems: Atherosclerosis; Peripheral Vascular Disease
MAUDE report 7647326 ↗
Other Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring devices
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring41 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring31 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring28 reports
- 2cm Peripheral Cutting Balloon® M001PCB8020900Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring18 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2105-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- ULTRASCORE US14150530Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring15 reports
- ULTRASCORE US14150615Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring14 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page