Skip to content

BioMend 0103ZRecalls & reported problems

Collagen Matrix, Inc. · Absorbable Collagen Membrane · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00813954020471), received between Aug 23, 2018 and Dec 23, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 23, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE CLINICIAN CLAIMED THAT THERE WAS A FAILURE WITH THE PRODUCT. SEVERAL UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS ANY PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OR ANY ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS INCIDENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9512431 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 23, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED DURING ROUTINE FOLLOW-UP VISIT, ONE WEEK AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANTATION OF THE MEMBRANE, THE MEMBRANE WAS GONE. TYPICAL PRODUCT RESORPTION AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE IS APPROXIMATELY 8 WEEKS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7810305 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 23, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED DURING ROUTINE FOLLOW-UP VISIT, ONE WEEK AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANTATION OF THE MEMBRANE, THE MEMBRANE WAS GONE. TYPICAL PRODUCT RESORPTION AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE IS APPROXIMATELY 8 WEEKS. THE CLINICIAN PERFORMED A FOLLOW-UP SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RE-GRAFT THE SITE WITH ANOTHER MEMBRANE

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7810302 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 23, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED DURING ROUTINE FOLLOW-UP VISIT, ONE WEEK AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANTATION OF THE MEMBRANE, THE MEMBRANE WAS GONE. TYPICAL PRODUCT RESORPTION AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE IS APPROXIMATELY 8 WEEKS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7810299 ↗

Other Barrier, Animal Source, Intraoral devices

All Barrier, Animal Source, Intraoral devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page