Skip to content

SYMBIOS® USOSCRM1520Recalls & reported problems

Dentsply Implants Manufacturing GmbH · OsteoShield® Collagen Resorbable Membrane (15x20mm) · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI D716OSCRM15200), received between Dec 7, 2016 and Dec 7, 2016.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body Reaction3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • Dec 7, 2016Patient-Device Incompatibility

    CLINICIAN OBSERVED A FOREIGN BODY REACTION WITH THE USE OF THE MEMBRANE. THE CLINICIAN THOUGHT IT WAS CAUSED BY THE MEMBRANE BUT ALSO MENTIONED PATIENT BORN AND SURGICALLY BORN ISSUES MAY HAVE LED TO WHAT WAS OBSERVED. COMPLAINT STATES THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction

    MAUDE report 6153417 ↗
  • Dec 7, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICIAN OBSERVED A FOREIGN BODY REACTION WITH THE USE OF THE MEMBRANE. THE CLINICIAN THOUGHT IT WAS CAUSED BY THE MEMBRANE BUT ALSO MENTIONED PATIENT BORN AND SURGICALLY BORN ISSUES MAY HAVE LED TO WHAT WAS OBSERVED. COMPLAINT STATES THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction

    MAUDE report 6153413 ↗
  • Dec 7, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICIAN OBSERVED A FOREIGN BODY REACTION WITH THE USE OF THE MEMBRANE. THE CLINICIAN THOUGHT IT WAS CAUSED BY THE MEMBRANE BUT ALSO MENTIONED PATIENT BORN AND SURGICALLY BORN ISSUES MAY HAVE LED TO WHAT WAS OBSERVED. COMPLAINT STATES THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction

    MAUDE report 6153397 ↗

Other Barrier, animal source, intraoral devices

All Barrier, animal source, intraoral devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.