Skip to content

DuraMatrix-Onlay Conform DMOC33Recalls & reported problems

Collagen Matrix, Inc. · Collagen Dural Regeneration Matrix · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00813954026107), received between Jul 22, 2025 and Jul 22, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Headache2
  • Convulsion/Seizure1
  • Speech Disorder1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 22, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NEUROSURGEON REPORTED TO THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT THE PRODUCT INVOLVED IS DURAMATRIX-ONLAY CONFORM, STATING THAT "FOUR PATIENTS NOW HAVE COME BACK PRESENTING WITH HEADACHES AND ONE HAD A SEIZURE". THE NEUROSURGEON NOTED "ALL CASES WERE CRANIOTOMIES. "ONE WAS A TUMOR, MENINGIOMA, MIDDLE FOSSA/CSF LEAK, AND SUBDURAL. THIS COMPLAINT PERTAINS TO PATIENT #3, WHO UNDERWENT A CRANIOTOMY AND SUBSEQUENTLY EXPERIENCED A HEADACHE AND SEIZURE. POSTOPERATIVE IMAGING REVEALED INFLAMMATION AROUND THE DURAL GRAFT SITE. THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH FLUID ACCUMULATION AND INFECTION, NECESSITATING A RETURN TO THE OR APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH POST OP. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 07/07/2025. THE LOT NUMBER AND ITEM NUMBER HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2025. APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS LATER, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED HEADACHES, SEIZURES, AND DYSARTHRIA. MR IMAGING SHOWED DURAL ENHANCEMENT WITH EPIDURAL FLUID COLLECTION. THERE WAS A CONCERN FOR ACTIVE SEIZURES, AND THE PATIENT WAS STARTED ON MEDICAL THERAPY. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REPEAT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 (REPEAT CRANIOTOMY FOR EXPLORATION) AS THE FLUID COLLECTION DID NOT DECREASE. DURA AND DURAL GRAFT WERE REPORTEDLY NOTED

    Patient problems: Convulsion/Seizure; Headache; Speech Disorder

    MAUDE report 22568612 ↗
  • InjuryJul 22, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A NEUROSURGEON REPORTED TO THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT THE PRODUCT INVOLVED IS DURAMATRIX-ONLAY CONFORM, STATING THAT "FOUR PATIENTS NOW HAVE COME BACK PRESENTING WITH HEADACHES AND ONE HAD A SEIZURE." THE NEUROSURGEON NOTED "ALL CASES WERE CRANIOTOMIES. "ONE WAS A TUMOR, MENINGIOMA, MIDDLE FOSSA/CSF LEAK, AND A SUBDURAL. THIS COMPLAINT PERTAINS TO PATIENT #2, WHO UNDERWENT A CRANIOTOMY AND SUBSEQUENTLY EXPERIENCED A HEADACHE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 07/07/2025. THE LOT NUMBER AND ITEM NUMBER HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2025. AN EXTENDED STAY IN THE HOSPITAL WAS INDICATED BUT NOTED WORSENING HEADACHES ABOUT 1 WEEK AFTER SURGERY. MR IMAGING SHOWED DURAL ENHANCEMENT AROUND THE OPERATIVE SITE AND EPIDURAL FLUID. THIS WAS MANAGED NONOPERATIVELY. HEADACHES IMPROVED OVER A FEW WEEKS WITH SUBSEQUENT SCANS SHOWING DECREASING FLUID. PATIENT OVERALL DID WELL. NO FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT'S STATUS FOLLOWING SYMPTOM RESOLUTION HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Headache

    MAUDE report 22568594 ↗

Other Dura Substitute devices

All Dura Substitute devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page