Penumbra Coil 400 4006C0306-ARecalls & reported problems
Penumbra, Inc. · Coil 400 Extra Soft, 3x6 · Class 2
All models of Penumbra Coil 400 (120)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00814548018188), received between Jan 12, 2024 and Jan 12, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 12, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN ORIGIN OF THE POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (PCOM) USING PENUMBRA COIL 400S (PC400S), A PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER (PX SLIM), AND A GUIDEWIRE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE WHILE ADVANCING THE PC400 AND REPORTED THAT THE COIL UNINTENTIONALLY DETACHED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PX SLIM. THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE PX SLIM CONTAINING THE PC400 AND FLUSHED THE COIL OUT OF THE PX SLIM USING A THREE ML SYRINGE.THE PHYSICIAN THEN RE-INTRODUCED THE SAME PX SLIM INTO THE TARGET LOCATION AND ATTEMPTED TO IMPLANT ANOTHER PC400. WHILE RETRACTING THE PC400 FOR RE-POSITIONING, THE PCOM DISSECTED CAUSING THROMBOSIS OF THE ANEURYSM AND PART OF THE PCOM. THEREFORE, THE PC400 WAS REMOVED INTACT. THE PHYSICIAN THEN ADMINISTERED AN ANTIPLATELET DRUG. THE PROCEDURE WAS ENDED AT THIS POINT.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 18509139 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page