Skip to content

Penumbra Coil 400 4002C1857-ARecalls & reported problems

Penumbra, Inc. · Coil 400 Standard, 18x60 · Class 2

All models of Penumbra Coil 400 (120)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00814548019345), received between Nov 30, 2023 and May 2, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Premature Separation; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Premature Separation

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT A RIGHT CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA (CCF) USING PENUMBRA COIL 400S (PC400S) AND A PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER (PX SLIM). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED A PC400 INTO THE CAROTID SINUS AND NOTICED THAT THE PC400 WAS OVERSIZED. THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO REMOVE THE COIL. WHILE RETRACTING THE PC400, THE PC400 UNINTENTIONALLY DETACHED, WITH PART OF THE COIL WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER AND THE OTHER PART IN THE MID-AORTA. THE PHYSICIAN THEN USED A SNARE TO RETRIEVE THE DETACHED PC400. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING FIVE ADDITIONAL PC400S AND THE SAME PX SLIM. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19235032 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 30, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT A CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA (CCF) USING PENUMBRA COIL 400S (PC400S), A PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER (PX SLIM), A NEURON 6F 070 DELIVERY CATHETER (NEURON 070), AND A NON-PENUMBRA LONG SHEATH. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AFTER ADVANCING APPROXIMATELY TWENTY CENTIMETERS OF A PC400 INTO THE FISTULA, THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE PC400 UNINTENTIONALLY DETACHED INSIDE THE PX SLIM. THEREFORE, THE PX SLIM CONTAINING THE DETACHED PC400 WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. NEXT, THE PHYSICIAN RE-ADVANCED THE SAME PX SLIM INTO THE FISTULA. WHILE ADVANCING ANOTHER PC400 HALFWAY THROUGH THE PX SLIM, THE COIL UNINTENTIONALLY DETACHED INSIDE THE PX SLIM. THEREFORE, THE PX SLIM CONTAINING THE DETACHED PC400 WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN PREFERRED TO USE A DIFFERENT CATHETER AND DECIDED TO REMOVE THE NEURON 070 FROM THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NON-PENUMBRA MICROCATHETER, NON-PENUMBRA COILS, A NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER, THE SAME LONG SHEATH, AND A LIQUID EMBOLIC AGENT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18241642 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page