Padlock Clip C910001 (UDI 00816765013793)Recalls & reported problems
US Endoscopy · The Padlock Clip defect closure system is used in flexible endoscopy for the compression of tissue in the gastrointestinal tract, for hemostasis or for treating lesions of the wall of the gastrointestinal organs. · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816765013793), received between Dec 1, 2017 and Oct 14, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Problem” (3 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K120814, K180689); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Problem3
- Material Protrusion/Extrusion2
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Defective Component1
- Device Fell1
- Difficult or Delayed Activation1
- Difficult to Advance1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
- Blood Loss1
- Injury1
- Insufficient Information1
- Laceration(s)1
- Laceration(s) of Esophagus1
- No Code Available1
- Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 14, 2020Defective Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED INCOMPLETE DEPLOYMENT OF A PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE DEVICE DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE, AND THE USER UTILIZED FORCEPS TO ASSIST DEPLOYMENT. THE CLIP WAS DEPLOYED SUCCESSFULLY, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, AND NO HARM TO THE PATIENT OR USER WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 10680065 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2020Failure to Advance; Material Protrusion/Extrusion
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING INTUBATION OF AN ENDOSCOPE WITH A PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM ATTACHED, THE USER WAS UNABLE TO ADVANCE PAST THE UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER. UPON WITHDRAWAL OF THE DEVICE, THE USER NOTED THE POINTS OF THE CLIP WERE PROTRUDING PAST THE DEPLOYMENT HOUSING. THE USER REPORTED LOCAL TRAUMA TO THE PATIENT'S OROPHARYNX WITH NO TREATMENT REQUIRED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PADLOCK DEVICE.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 10200759 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2020Device Fell; Activation Problem
A USER FACILITY REPORTED THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTOR IN (B)(6) THAT A PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT FULLY DEPLOY, AND THE CLIP SUBSEQUENTLY DROPPED FROM THE DEPLOYMENT HOUSING INTO THE PATIENT'S STOMACH. THE CLIP WAS IMMEDIATELY RETRIEVED USING A RAPTOR GRASPING DEVICE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP DEVICE. NO HARM TO THE PATIENT OR USER WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9948320 ↗MalfunctionDec 13, 2019Activation Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE PADLOCK CLIP FAILED TO DEPLOY DURING USE IN A PROCEDURE TO CLOSE A FISTULA. THE CLIP WAS RELEASED INTO THE PATIENT'S STOMACH AND RETRIEVED WITH A RAPTOR GRASPING FORCEPS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PADLOCK CLIP DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9466462 ↗MalfunctionNov 27, 2019Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Activation Problem
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED THE CLIP COMPONENT WAS NOT FULLY DEPLOYED DURING USE OF THE PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM, NECESSITATING DEVICE WITHDRAWAL WITH THE CLIP PRONGS PARTIALLY PROTRUDING FROM THE DELIVERY HOUSING. SCRATCHES WERE DETECTED ON THE ESOPHAGUS HOWEVER NO TREATMENT WAS REQUIRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 9382743 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2019Difficult to Advance
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED DIFFICULTY PASSING THE PADLOCK DEFECT CLOSURE DEVICE THROUGH THE UPPER ESOPHAGUS DURING A PROCEDURE TO CLOSE A FISTULA. SUBSEQUENT TO INSERTION OF THE DEVICE, A LACERATION OF THE ESOPHAGUS WAS NOTED. AN INJECTION OF EPINEPHRINE WAS ADMINISTERED TO CONTROL BLEEDING AND THE FISTULA CLOSURE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED.
Patient problems: Laceration(s) of Esophagus
MAUDE report 8649819 ↗InjuryMar 7, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED A PERFORATION WAS DETECTED DURING USE OF THE PADLOCK CLIP DEVICE IN A POLYP RESECTION PROCEDURE. THE CLIP WAS DEPLOYED OVER A DUODENAL POLYP PRIOR TO RESECTION AND THE POLYP WAS RESECTED ABOVE THE CLIP. THE TISSUE SEPARATED FROM THE CLIP, EXPOSING THE RESECTION SITE PERFORATION. SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS NEEDED, AND THE PATIENT HAS BEEN DISCHARGED.
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 8398493 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2019Nonstandard Device
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED AN ESOPHAGEAL LACERATION OCCURRED DURING A PROCEDURE IN WHICH OUR PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM WAS ONE OF THE MEDICAL DEVICES UTILIZED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE, AND THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL FOR OBSERVATION AND HAS SINCE BEEN DISCHARGED.
Patient problems: Laceration(s)
MAUDE report 8323666 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2019Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE PADLOCK CLIP FAILED TO ENGAGE TISSUE. THE CLIP WAS RELEASED INTO THE STOMACH AND RETRIEVED WITH A ROTH NET. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE, AND THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8310432 ↗MalfunctionJan 4, 2019Difficult or Delayed Activation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED DIFFICULTY WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DEPLOY THE CLIP COMPONENT OF THE PADLOCK DEVICE DURING A HEMOSTASIS PROCEDURE. THE CLIP WAS DEPLOYED ON THE THIRD ATTEMPT; HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT BELIEVE BLEEDING WAS CONTROLLED AFTER CLIP PLACEMENT AND THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY FOR FURTHER TREATMENT. THROUGH FOLLOW UP, US ENDOSCOPY LEARNED THE ENDOSCOPE USED IN THIS PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE PADLOCK CLIP DEVICE.
Patient problems: Blood Loss
MAUDE report 8219054 ↗MalfunctionDec 1, 2017Positioning Failure
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED DURING A HEMOSTASIS PROCEDURE TWO PADLOCK CLIPS FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY SENT TO INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AND WAS DISCHARGED THE SAME DAY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7075905 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K120814, K180689. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1011-2019 · Feb 4, 2019 · TerminatedUS Endoscopy Padlock Clip defect closure system Ref: C910001 The Padlock Clip is indicated for use in flexible endoscopy and for the compression of tissue in the gastrointestinal
Other Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract devices
- Resolution 360 Clip M00521230Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract3 deaths2,291 reports
- Resolution Clip M00522610Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1,116 reports
- Instinct G58010Cook Incorporated · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1 recall1,017 reports
- Resolution 360™ ULTRA Clip M00521400Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract3 deaths496 reports
- Instinct G18343Cook Incorporated · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract244 reports
- MANTIS™ Clip M00521420Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract195 reports
- Single Use Repositionable Clip HX-202UROlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1 recall118 reports
- colonic FTRD Set 14Ovesco Endoscopy AG · Hemostatic Metal Clip For The Gi Tract2 deaths95 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page