Padlock ClipRecalls & reported problems across all models
US Endoscopy · 3 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 67
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls
- 0
We found 3 models of Padlock Clip by US Endoscopy in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 67 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Dec 1, 2017 and Aug 7, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 65 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Fire” (36 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Padlock Clip problems
Device problems
- Failure to Fire36
- Activation Problem6
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem4
- Failure to Advance4
- Material Protrusion/Extrusion4
- Defective Component2
- Failure to Cut2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions48
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
- Insufficient Information3
- Blood Loss2
- Pain2
- Bowel Burn1
- Burn(s)1
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
Padlock Clip models
3 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Padlock Clip C910001Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract46 reports
- Padlock Clip C910001Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract11 reports
- Padlock Clip 00713229SNARE, FLEXIBLE10 reports
Recent Padlock Clip adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 7, 2026Sparking
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50175373 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A COMPLETED PROCEDURE THAT UTILIZED THE PADLOCK CLIP EFTR KIT, THE PATIENT CAME BACK WITH BLOOD FROM THE VESSEL AT THE CLIP LOCATION. THE VESSEL WAS TREATED.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 25394905 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE, USER FACILITY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY WITH THE SNARE FOLLOWING DEPLOYMENT OF THE PADLOCK CLIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND NO INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25243227 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP STANDARD DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP STANDARD WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE RESULTING IN A PROCEDURE DELAY. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24965016 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Premature Activation
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED VIA VIGILANCE REPORT THAT THEIR PADLOCK CLIP STANDARD WAS ALREADY DEPLOYED INTO THE SAFETY CAP BEFORE USE. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24454649 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THEIR PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM WAS REMOVED WITH THE CLIP PARTIALLY DEPLOYED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS UTILIZED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24400829 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED FOLLOWING USE OF THEIR PADLOCK CLIP EFTR KIT A "SUPERFICIAL THERMAL INJURY TO THE MUCOSA" WAS OBSERVED ON THE LUMEN WALL OPPOSITE THE RESECTION SITE. NO MEDICAL TREATMENT ADMINISTERED. NO REPORT OF DELAY.
Patient problems: Burn(s)
MAUDE report 24270738 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A PATIENT PROCEDURE INVOLVING A PADLOCK CLIP EFTR KIT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN AND BLEEDING. THE PATIENT RECEIVED ADDITIONAL MEDICAL TREATMENT AND IS DOING WELL.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 23728846 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED VIA VIGILANCE REPORT THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THEIR PADLOCK CLIP STANDARD FAILED TO DEPLOY AFTER THE CLIP WAS USED TO TREAT A BLEEDING ULCER. THE CLIP WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Ulcer
MAUDE report 23585889 ↗MalfunctionSep 19, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP EFTR KIT WOULD NOT DEPLOY. THE DOCTOR ELECTED TO LEAVE THE TISSUE WITHOUT DOING A RESECTION. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23095276 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Activation Problem; Activation Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE SNARE TO THEIR PADLOCK CLIP EFTR DEVICE DID NOT DEPLOY PROPERLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A DIFFERENT SNARE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23084232 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2025Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE SNARE TO THEIR PADLOCK CLIP EFTR KIT DID NOT FULLY RESECT THE TISSUE. TWO DIFFERENT SNARES AND FORCEPS WERE UTILIZED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY FOLLOWING A SHORT DELAY. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22612552 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE RESULTING IN A PROCEDURE DELAY. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22591360 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2025Activation Problem; Activation Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE SNARE TO THEIR PADLOCK CLIP EFTR DEVICE DID NOT DEPLOY PROPERLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A DIFFERENT HOT SNARE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22349847 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH VACUUM THERAPY. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22344879 ↗
Other US Endoscopy products
All US Endoscopy devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page