HydroSoft Helical 100152H2HS-V-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant
All models of HydroSoft Helical (21)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00816777022837), received between Sep 15, 2025 and Sep 15, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Separation1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 15, 2025Unraveled Material; Premature Separation; Unraveled Material; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TREATMENT OF A RIGHT M2 MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY BIFURCATION ANEURYSM, A JAILING TECHNIQUE WAS PERFORMED USING THE COMBINATION OF A STENT AND COIL. AFTER THE CATHETERIZING THE ANEURYSM AND INTRODUCING THE FIRST COIL LOOP, THE STENT WAS RELEASED. THEN, A MICROCATHETER WITH A PARTIALLY DEPLOYED COIL WAS ADVANCED TOWARD THE INFERIOR M2 BRANCH. ATTEMPTS TO REPOSITION AND RECAPTURE THE COIL WITHIN THE ANEURYSM WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. GIVEN THE LACK OF RESPONSE, THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED TO APPLY TRACTION ON THE PUSHER, BUT THE COIL DID NOT RETRACT. FINALLY, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE STRETCHING AND RESISTANCE ON THE PART OF THE COIL CONNECTING AT ITS PRIMARY COIL HELIX HAD RUPTURED CAUSING IT TO BE UNDONE AND COMPLETELY ELONGATED. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND WAS DISCARDED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BY IMPLANTING A STENT. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT IS IN GOOD CONDITION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23058558 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page