Skip to content

HydroFrame 10 Advanced 100408HFRM-V-A2Recalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant

All models of HydroFrame 10 Advanced (22)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777023513), received between Mar 27, 2018 and Apr 21, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Difficult To Position1
  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • Aneurysm1
  • Death1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Rupture1
  • Thrombus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MICROCATHETER WAS DELIVERED TO THE BASE OF THE ANEURYSM, UPON DELIVERING THE COIL THE RESISTANCE WAS FELT (BEFORE REACHING THE 'ZEBRA' MARKER). WHILE THE COIL WAS BEING REMOVED, IT DETACHED AND GOT STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: THE CLINIC INFORMED US THAT THE SITUATION HAD NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21877967 ↗
  • InjuryOct 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED THROUGH THE CLINICAL STUDY, RAGE "THE REPORTED ANEURYSM RECANALIZED AND REQUIRED RETREATMENT THAT ALSO RESULTED IN A MALFUNCTION, THE MICROCATHETER DISPLACING. EVENT INFORMATION EVENT TERM: ANEURYSM RECANALIZATION EVENT #: 4 EVENT START DATE: (B)(6) 2019. POST OPERATIVE DAYS: 82 DAYS EVENT DESCRIPTION MRI (B)(6) 2019 RECANALIZED NECK MEASURING 7X6X4MM ENLARGED COMPARED TO PREVIOUS. DSA (B)(6) 2020 RETREATMENT OF ANEURYSM, AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE MINIMAL ANEURYSM FILLING. MRI (B)(6) 2020 SMALL RESIDUAL AT NECK OF BASILAR TIP ANEURYSM, SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASED COMPARED TO MRI ON (B)(6) 2019. MRI (B)(6) 2021 MINIMALLY INCREASED CONTRAST OPACIFICATION NOTED AT NECK OF PREVIOUSLY COILED BASILAR TIP ANEURYSM. REASON #8 NOT DETACHED: MICROCATHETER DISPLACED SO COIL NOT DEPLOYED AE OUTCOME : RESOLVED WITHOUT SEQUELAE.

    Patient problems: Aneurysm

    MAUDE report 20413587 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2020Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PLACEMENT OF THE SECOND COIL IN AN ANEURYSM, THE PREVIOUSLY PLACED COIL WAS DISLOCATED AND STRETCHED, AND THE SECOND COIL COULD NOT ADVANCE INTO THE ANEURYSM. DURING THE ATTEMPT TO WITHDRAW THE SECOND COIL, THE COIL DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER. PART OF THE DETACHED COIL REMAINS IN THE ANEURYSM AND PART OF THE COIL IS IN THE PARENT VESSEL. NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE PATIENT WOKE UP IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PROCEDURE AND HAD NO ABNORMAL SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENT'S CURRENT CONDITION IS REPORTED TO BE "NORMAL."

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10429313 ↗
  • DeathMar 27, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Difficult To Position; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Difficult To Position

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE TREATMENT OF AN ACUTE ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM, THE FRAMING COIL DID NOT FULLY ADVANCE INTO THE ANEURYSM, LEAVING APPROXIMATELY 1CM OF THE COIL IN THE A1 SEGMENT. COIL LOOPS HAD PERFORATED THE ANEURYSM; THEREFORE, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO DETACH THE COIL. THE COIL DID NOT DETACH AFTER FOUR (4) ATTEMPTS WERE MADE. A BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO PROTECT THE ANEURYSM. AFTER AN ATTEMPT TO RESHEATH AND REMOVE THE COIL, THE COIL APPEARED TO MIGRATE INTO THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL M1 - M3 ARTERIAL SEGMENTS. ADDITIONAL COILS WERE THEN IMPLANTED IN THE ANEURYSM. PART OF THE 1ST COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY. A CLOT WAS THEN NOTED IN THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY, AND A STENT RETRIEVER WAS USED. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE DIED; HOWEVER, IT IS UNKNOWN WHEN THE DEATH OCCURRED. THE CAUSE OF THE PATIENT'S DEATH IS ALSO UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Death; Rupture; Thrombus

    MAUDE report 7376187 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page