V-Trak 7110-0405-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · HydroFrame 10 Advanced · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Trak (75)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777023650), received between Nov 7, 2018 and Mar 31, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Advance1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Aneurysm1
- Neuropathy1
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 31, 2026Unraveled Material; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE EMBOLIZATION COIL WAS USED TO TREAT A PATIENT WITH AN ACOMM ANEURYSM. REPORTEDLY, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO ADVANCE THE COIL AND THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO PULL THE COIL BACK INTO THE SHEATH WHEN THE COIL STARTED TO UNRAVEL AND WOULD NOT GO BACK INTO THE SHEATH. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE CASE WAS ABORTED AS THE COIL COULD NOT BE PLACED IN THE ANEURYSM. NO COILS WERE IMPLANTED DURING THE CASE. REPORTEDLY, VESSEL ANATOMY WAS THE MAIN REASON WHY PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO TREAT THE ANEURYSM. AT THE END OF PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS THE SAME AS PRE PROCEDURE AND CURRENTLY "BASELINE." THE PHYSICIAN PLANS TO BRING THE PATIENT TO SURGERY TO CLIP THE ANEURYSM; HOWEVER, NO DATE IS SET.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24743085 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED THROUGH A RAGE CLINICAL STUDY, AN INTERVAL UNWINDING OF COIL MASS IN THE LUMEN OF THE ANEURYSMAL CAVITY WAS SUGGESTIVE OF PREVIOUS PRESENCE OF PARTIAL THROMBOSIS WITHIN THE ANEURYSM AT THE TIME OF EMERGENT END-VASCULAR REPAIR, AS WELL AS PRESENCE OF SMALL ANEURYSM NECK RECANALIZATION, SIZE 2.5X2.6X2.2. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT RETREATMENT WITH THE PLACEMENT OF A FLOW DIVERTER. THE PATIENT EXITED THE STUDY ON THE SAME DAY AS THE RETREATMENT. NO OTHER ADVERSE EVENTS ARE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aneurysm; Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 20646776 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS PERFORMING A BALLOON ASSISTED COILING PROCEDURE ON THE LEFT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA) AT THE BIFURCATION. WHILE ADVANCING THE COIL UP THE MICROCATHETER AND FIRST SEGMENT OF COIL WAS IN THE ANEURYSM, THE COIL UNEXPECTEDLY DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER WITHOUT ACTIVATING THE DETACHMENT CONTROLLER. A SNARE WAS USED AND SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED THE COIL. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY TO THE PATIENT, WHO WAS FINE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11942558 ↗InjuryNov 7, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN UNEVENTFUL BALLOON ASSISTED COILING PROCEDURE FOR A RUPTURED RIGHT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM WAS PERFORMED ON A PATIENT THAT PRESENTED WITH SUDDEN HEADACHE AND REDUCED CONSCIOUS LEVEL, AND SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE. POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WOKE UP WITH IPSILATERAL 3RD NERVE PALSY. THE CONDITION DID NOT IMPROVE WITH A SHORT COURSE OF STEROIDS, AND THE PATIENT UNDERWENT NEUROSURGICAL NERVE DECOMPRESSION TWO (2) DAYS LATER, WHICH WAS BELIEVED TO BE A RESULT OF AN IMMEDIATE MASS EFFECT OF THE COILED ANEURYSM ON THE 3RD NERVE.
Patient problems: Neuropathy
MAUDE report 8049356 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page