V-Trak 7110-0715-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · HydroFrame 10 Advanced · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Trak (75)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777023711), received between Feb 21, 2019 and Apr 29, 2021 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 29, 2021Unraveled Material; Separation Failure; Unraveled Material; Separation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT OF A RUPTURED ANEURYSM OF THE POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY, AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT COULD NOT BE RETRACTED INTO THE MICROCATHETER. ATTEMPTS TO DETACH THE IMPLANT WITH A DETACHMENT CONTROLLER DID NOT WORK. ALL ACCESS DEVICES WERE WITHDRAWN AND THE IMPLANT AND PORTION OF THE PUSHER WIRE WERE LEFT IN THE VASCULATURE FROM THE PCOM TO THE FEMORAL ACCESS POINT. THE PATIENT'S STATUS IS CURRENTLY STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11750666 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2019Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT OF A RUPTURED ANEURYSM IN THE OPHTHALMIC LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA), TWO COILS WERE PLACED IN THE ANEURYSM WITHOUT ISSUE. A THIRD COIL WAS PLACED WITHIN THE ANEURYSM BUT WOULD NOT DETACH. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO REMOVE THE COIL AFTER TWO ATTEMPTS OF FAILED DETACHMENT. DURING REMOVAL, THE COIL DETACHED INTO TWO (2) PIECES IN THE MICROCATHETER. BOTH SEGMENTS WERE REMOVED IN THEIR ENTIRETY FROM THE PATIENT ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY AS A RESULT AND THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE POST-OPERATIVE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8360252 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page