V-Trak 7110-0931-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · HydroFrame 10 Advanced · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Trak (75)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777023759), received between Mar 27, 2019 and Oct 11, 2022 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 11, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, TWO (2) CONSECUTIVE COILS DID NOT FIT THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER. BOTH COILS STARTED TO CATCH IN THE LUMEN AND DETACHED IN THE CATHETER PRIOR TO USE OF THE CONTROLLER. THE COILS WERE REMOVED IN ONE PIECE, AND ADDITIONAL COILS WERE USED FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR ISSUES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15580764 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING VENOUS SINUS EMBOLIZATION FOR A DURAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA, THE COIL DETACHED WITHOUT USE OF THE CONTROLLER DURING REMOVAL FROM THE COIL MASS. THE COIL WAS REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY TOGETHER WITH THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE DOING FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8457874 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page