V-Trak 100306HS-V-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · MicroPlex HyperSoft Helical · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Trak (75)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777024114), received between Oct 25, 2018 and Jul 1, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Component Missing2
- Stretched2
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 1, 2026Component Missing
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CONCERNED EMBOLIZATION COIL WAS BEING USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COIL-ASSIST STENT TO TREAT A PATIENT WITH A LEFT PCOM ANEURYSM USING "JAILING" TECHNIQUE. AFTER PLACING THE STENT (REF. MFR REPORT#: 2032493-2026-08049), THE PHYSICIAN STARTED COILING THE ANEURYSM WITH THE CONCERNED COIL AND REPORTEDLY NOTED THAT THE 3CM PROXIMAL RADIOPAQUE MARKER WAS MISSING FROM THE COIL. THE PHYSICIAN USED FLUOROSCOPY TO ASSESS WHETHER THE COIL WAS INSIDE THE ANEURYSMAL SAC IN ORDER TO DETACH IT, AS THIS CAN BE MISLEADING AT CERTAIN ANGLES. THE PHYSICIAN COULD SEE WHEN THE COIL WAS ON THE TIP OF THE MICROCATHETER FOR THE DETACHMENT ZONE. THE COIL WAS DETACHED AND IMPLANTED IN THE ANEURYSM. THE PATIENT WAS DOING VERY WELL AFTER THE PROCEDURE AND WAS ABLE TO MOVE BOTH ARMS AND LEGS; AND ABLE TO ANSWER USUAL QUESTIONS. THIS IS EVENT REPORT 2 OF 2.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25681827 ↗MalfunctionJun 23, 2026Component Missing
AS REPORTED: WHEN THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE MICROCATHETER, DR. NOTICED THAT THERE WAS NO RADIOPAQUE MARKING ON THE PROXIMAL END OF THE COIL. THE COIL WAS REMOVED AS A PRECAUTION BUT WAS DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY IN THE WASTE BIN. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25591473 ↗InjuryJan 11, 2022Stretched; Stretched
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT, THE PUSHER OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT STRETCHED DURING POSITIONING. A STENT WAS USED TO AFFIX THE PUSHER TO THE VESSEL WALL BUT THE STRETCHED PORTION EXTENDED INTO THE CAROTID ARTERY. A STENT WAS USED TO REMOVE THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE COIL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13232794 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2021Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT KEPT COMING OUT OF THE ANEURYSM NECK DURING PLACEMENT. THE COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WHERE IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE COIL WAS THE INCORRECT SIZE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12340476 ↗InjuryOct 25, 2018Stretched; Stretched
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING REPOSITIONING OF THE EMBOLIZATION COIL IN AN ANEURYSM, THE COIL STRETCHED AND THEN COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN INTO THE MICROCATHETER. THE COIL WAS PUSHED FORWARD UNTIL IT WAS FULLY WITHIN THE ANEURYSM AND WAS THEN INTENTIONALLY DETACHED MANUALLY WTIHOUT THE CONTROLLER. FOLLOW-UP ANGIOGRAPHY DEMONSTRATED THROMBUS AT THE NECK OF THE ANEURYSM AND IN THE VESSEL. IV INTEGRILIN WAS ADMINISTERED AS TREATMENT. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE ALRIGHT AND HAD A GOOD OUTCOME.
Patient problems: Thrombus
MAUDE report 8007117 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page