AZUR 45-780304-LRecalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · Azur CX Detachable · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AZUR (14)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777024381), received between Jan 18, 2018 and Nov 6, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Migration1
- Separation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 6, 2023Migration; Separation Problem; Migration; Separation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT USED TO TREAT A BLEED WOULD NOT FULLY DETACH WITH THE DETACHMENT CONTROLLER. THE COIL PARTIALLY DEPLOYED AND THEN BECAME DISLODGED, MIGRATING TO A DIFFERENT VESSEL WITHIN THE LIVER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY OR INTERVENTION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON NOVEMBER 9TH: THERE WAS NO ADVERSE AFFECT TO THE PATIENT AND THEY ARE DOING WELL. THERE ARE NO PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COIL¿S POSITION. A GDA BLEED WAS BEING TREATED. THE COIL DETACHED WHEN IT WAS BEING RETRACTED AND CAUGHT ON THE BASE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18080684 ↗MalfunctionMay 1, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT OF A PSEUDOANEURYSM, AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT DETACHED WHILE BEING RETRACTED INTO THE CATHETER FOR REPOSITIONING. THE PROGREAT CATHETER WAS REMOVED WITH THE COIL INSIDE OF IT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INTERVENTION OR PATIENT INJURY. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS REPORTED TO BE "STABLE."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11758663 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ATTEMPT TO ADVANCE THE EMBOLIZATION COIL, THE COIL DETACHED IN THE CATHETER. BOTH SEGMENTS OF THE COIL WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT IN THEIR ENTIRETY ALONG WITH THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INTERVENTION OR PATIENT INJURY. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7712665 ↗MalfunctionJan 18, 2018Detachment Of Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility; Detachment Of Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SEVERAL COILS HAD BEEN PLACED IN AN ACTIVE GASTROINTESTINAL BLEED. DURING POSITIONING OF THE FINAL COIL, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED AND THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN. DURING REMOVAL, THE COIL FELT "STICKY," AND HALF OF THE COIL DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER WITH THE OTHER HALF IN THE INTENDED TREATMENT AREA. BOTH SEGMENTS OF THE COIL WERE REMOVED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TOGETHER WITH THE MICROCATHETER AND THE GUIDING CATHETER AS A SINGLE UNIT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7204357 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page