Skip to content

HydroFill Helical 100620HFIL-V-A2Recalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant

All models of HydroFill Helical (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777024411), received between Apr 5, 2018 and Aug 21, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation3
  • Detachment Of Device Component1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Migration1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 21, 2026Unraveled Material; Migration; Premature Separation

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50381055 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 30, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    AS REPORTED: THE HYDROFILL 6/20 COIL BROKE IN THE MICROCATHETER DURING THE COIL'S ASCENT TO THE ANEURYSM, IN A PATIENT ADMITTED FOR SAH AFTER ANEURYSM RUPTURE. THE DOCTOR REMOVED BOTH THE COIL AND MICROCATHETER. COIL WAS STUCK IN THE MICROCATHETER. NO SNARE WAS USED. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22355900 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 12, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE IN THE MICROCATHETER AND THEN DETACHED UNEXPECTEDLY. THERE WAS NO INJURY OR INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE "FINE AND WELL." ANOTHER EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT ENCOUNTERED THE SAME ISSUE DURING THE CASE AND WAS REPORTED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDICAL DEVICE REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20207961 ↗
  • InjuryApr 5, 2018Detachment Of Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment Of Device Component; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING POSITIONING OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IN AN ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM, THE COIL DETACHED IN THE INTENDED AREA. THE DETACHED COIL WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED WITH A SNARE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7399806 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page