V-Trak 8410-0308-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · HyperSoft 3D Advanced · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Trak (75)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00816777025159), received between Feb 10, 2017 and Feb 10, 2017 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment Of Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Difficult To Position1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 10, 2017Detachment Of Device Component; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Difficult To Position; Stretched; Detachment Of Device Component; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Difficult To Position; Stretched
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT-ASSISTED COILING WAS PERFORMED ON A PREVIOUSLY COILED ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY (ACA) ANEURYSM. AFTER IMPLANTATION OF SEVERAL COILS, THE HYPERSOFT 3D COIL WAS PLACED; HOWEVER, PART OF THE COIL WAS NOTED TO BE LOOPING INTO THE IPSILATERAL A2 ARTERY. DURING AN ATTEMPT TO SLOWLY REMOVE THE COIL, THE COIL DETACHED AFTER APPROXIMATELY 10MM OF THE COIL HAD BEEN WITHDRAWN. THE PUSHER WIRE WAS REMOVED AND THE JAILED CATHETER WITH THE COIL INSIDE WAS PULLED BACK INTO THE PROXIMAL ACA. THE COIL LOOPS THAT WERE NOTICED IN THE IPSILATERAL A2 WERE GONE; HOWEVER, THE DETACHED COIL THAT WAS NOT JAILED BY THE STENT TRAVELED TO THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA). A STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE MCA TO TRAP THE DETACHED COIL SEGMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE DOING WELL.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6324601 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page