HydroSoft 3D 7110-0206-3D-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant
All models of HydroSoft 3D (26)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777025395), received between Aug 31, 2018 and Feb 9, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration3
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning2
- Premature Separation2
- Component Missing1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Speech Disorder1
- Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL BROKE WHILE BEING DEPLOYED THROUGH AN ATLAS STENT. ANOTHER STENT WAS NEEDED TO TACK THE COIL UP AND KEEP IT OUT OF THE PARENT VESSEL. NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24300304 ↗InjurySep 28, 2024Component Missing; Migration; Component Missing; Migration
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THE WARNING MARKERS WERE SEEN PRIOR TO THE COIL ENTERING THE PATIENT. WARNING MARKERS WERE NOT MISSING. THE COIL REMAINS IMPLANTED IN THE WRONG AREA. THE PATIENT WILL RECEIVE NO FURTHER TREATMENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS REPORTED AS NOT HARMED. THE OPERATIVE REPORT WAS REQUESTED, BUT IT WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20329051 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2023Migration; Premature Separation; Migration; Premature Separation
A USER MEDWATCH WAS RECEIVED (B)(4) ON NOV 16TH, 2023, CONTAINING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED COMPLAINT. THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION STATED THAT A 46 YR. OLD FEMALE PRESENTED FOR AN ELECTIVE CEREBRAL ANEURYSM COILING. THE STENTING OF THE VESSEL WAS SUCCESSFUL. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ACUTE OCCLUSION, AND THE PATIENT SYMPTOMS ARE IMPROVING.
Patient problems: Speech Disorder
MAUDE report 18066901 ↗InjuryMay 16, 2019Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility
A MEDSUN REPORT # (B)(4) WAS RECEIVED AND REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A RIGHT MEDIAL TEMPORAL INTRA-CRANIAL HEMORRHAGE WITH ASSOCIATED RIGHT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM UNDERWENT DIAGNOSTIC FEMORAL CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAM WITH PRIMARY COIL EMBOLIZATION OF THE RIGHT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM. FOUR (4) COILS WERE DEPLOYED. FOLLOWING THIS, A HYRDROSOFT 3D (2MM X 6CM) COIL WAS DEPLYED. PER THE OPERATIVE REPORT, INCREASED RESISTANCE WAS MET UPON DEPLOYMENT OF THIS COIL, AND UPON RESPOSITIONING THE COIL WITHIN THE ANEURYSM SAC, THE COIL WAS IDENTIFIED TO HAVE STRETCHED AND DETACHED ON ITS OWN. IN THE PROCESS TO ADJUST, IT WAS NOTED THE COIL TAIL HERNIATED INTO THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY. THE COIL WAS EVENTUALLY SNARED AND REMOVED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE EVENT DATE WAS NOTED AT (B)(6) 2019; HOWEVER, THE EXACT DATE WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8616696 ↗InjuryFeb 7, 2019Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Positioning
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IN A PATIENT ENROLLED IN A CLINICAL TRIAL, A SMALL PORTION OF THE COIL (TAIL) EXTENDED INTO THE PARENT ARTERY. THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED 325MG ASPIRIN DAILY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8318969 ↗InjurySep 11, 2018Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Positioning
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IN A RUPTURED INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSM, THE PROXIMAL END OF THE COIL (TAIL) DID NOT STAY IN THE ANEURYSM AND EXTENDED INTO THE PARENT VESSEL. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF THROMBUS FORMATION; HOWEVER, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN PRESCRIBED DAILY BABY ASPIRIN TO AVOID PLATELET AGGREGATION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7866304 ↗InjuryAug 31, 2018Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EMBOLIZATION COIL WAS IMPLANTED IN A RUPTURED BASILAR APEX ANEURYSM ON (B)(6) 2018. APPROXIMATELY 13 DAYS LATER, A STRAIGHT, TAIL-LIKE SEGMENT OF THE COIL CAME OUT OF THE ANEURYSM INTO THE PROXIMAL RIGHT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY. A CLOT WAS NOTED AROUND THE TAIL SEGMENT, AND A THALAMIC STROKE WAS OBSERVED. ASPIRIN AND HEPARIN WERE ADMINISTERED TO THE PATIENT AS TREATMENT FOR THE CLOT. A CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY SHOWED NO EVIDENCE OF THROMBOEMBOLIC COMPLICATIONS. THE CLOT APPEARS TO HAVE RESOLVED AND THERE ARE NO STROKE SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE RECOVERING WELL.
Patient problems: Thrombus
MAUDE report 7840080 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page