V-Trak 7110-0254-3D-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · HydroSoft 3D · Class 2 · Implant
All models of V-Trak (75)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777025425), received between Jul 25, 2018 and Apr 1, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Paraplegia1
- Stroke/CVA1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 1, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AS REPORTED: HYDROSOFT COIL MIGRATED AFTER SUCCESSFUL BALLOON ASSISTED COILING INTERVENTION FROM THE SAME LEFT A1 ANEURYSM. THE A2 DID NOT HAVE FLOW FOR SEVERAL MINUTES AND THE TOTAL TIME UNTIL FULL FLOW WAS RESTORED WAS A TOTAL OF 1 HOUR; THIS RESULTED IN A STROKE. DR. DID NOT PERFORM STENT ASSISTED COILING BECAUSE THE CORRECT LENGTH DEVICE WAS NOT ON THEIR SHELF AND HE DID NOT WANT TO COVER THE ANTERIOR CHORIDAL. DR. TRIED TO RETRIEVE THE COIL WITH A THROMBUS RETRIEVAL DEVICE (2 PASSES) AND SMALL MICROSNARE ALONG WITH ASPIRATION. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO UTILIZE A STENT 2.5X23 (172020) TO KEEP THE COIL ALONGSIDE A1 SEGMENT VESSEL WALL AND RESTORE FLOW. A1 EXPERIENCED VESSEL SPASM, BUT NO EVIDENCE OF ANY DAMAGE CONFIRMED WITH IN SUITE CTA. THE PATIENT AFTER WAKING UP COULD NOT MOVE HIS RIGHT LEG OR ARM AND WAS APHASIC. SYMPTOMS STARTED TO IMPROVE. PATIENT IS CURRENTLY TALKING AND ABLE TO MOVE HIS RIGHT HAND, THE RIGHT LEG IS STILL NOT MOVING.
Patient problems: Paraplegia; Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 21748453 ↗MalfunctionDec 9, 2020Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Stretched; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT-ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (ACOM) ANEURYSM, THE EMBOLIZATION COIL STRETCHED IN THE ANEURYSM AND THEN DETACHED. THE MICROCATHETER WAS REMOVED AND A STRETCHED SEGMENT OF THE COIL REMAINS IN THE PARENT ARTERY. NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE DOING WELL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10980793 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT FOR A RUPTURED ANEURYSM, THE COIL WAS IMPLANTED. CT IMAGES TAKEN 3 DAYS LATER SHOWED THE COIL HAD DISLODGED AND MIGRATED DOWNSTREAM TO THE RIGHT DISTAL INFERIOR DIVISION. NO INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED FOR THE MIGRATED COIL. THE INITIAL TREATMENT SITE WAS RE-COILED WITH STENT ASSISTANCE THE DAY AFTER THE CT WAS PERFORMED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED AND IS REPORTED TO BE ALERT AND ORIENTED, AND THERE ARE NO NEUROLOGIC DEFICITS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7721281 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page