HydroSoft 3D 100208HFRM-V-3D-A2Recalls & reported problems
Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant
All models of HydroSoft 3D (26)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777026521), received between Jul 17, 2020 and Mar 4, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Separation2
- Component Missing1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Separation Failure1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Ruptured Aneurysm1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 4, 2025Component Missing; Component Missing
IT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED THE INTRODUCER FAILED TO DETECT THE INSERTION OF THE COIL INSIDE. THE COIL COULD NOT BE USED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CLARIFIED THAT THERE WAS NO COIL AT THE DISTAL PART OF THE PUSHER. ANOTHER COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. PATIENT STATUS IS GOOD; THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR CONSEQUENCE. NO OTHER CLARIFICATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21521232 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE DURING ADVANCEMENT IN A MICROCATHETER. THE COIL BECAME STUCK AND WAS REMOVED. DURING REMOVAL, THE IMPLANT DETACHED FROM THE PUSHER. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AN THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER COIL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17455834 ↗InjuryMar 12, 2022Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION OF ANEURYSM, THE COIL WAS POSITIONED FOR DESIRABLE PLACEMENT. THE COIL BECAME STUCK WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER, STRETCHED AND COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN. THE COIL WAS REMOVED USING A SNARE DEVICE SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT HARM OR INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13745385 ↗DeathJun 18, 2021Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT MV COILS WERE UTILIZED TO TREAT A SERIOUSLY ILL PATIENT WITH A RUPTURED ANEURYSM OF THE ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY. AFTER SUCCESSFUL PLACEMENT OF FOUR COILS, THE SURGEON REPORTED DIFFICULTY IN REPOSITIONING OF THE 5TH EMBOLIZATION COIL. THE COIL APPARENTLY DETACHED DURING REPOSITIONING, COULD NOT BE REMOVED, AND APPROXIMATELY 4CM OF THE COIL WAS LEFT IN THE ICA AND A1 SEGMENT OF THE ACA. A STENT WAS PLACED TO AFFIX THE COIL TO THE WALLS OF THE VESSEL. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE PASSED AWAY THE FOLLOWING DAY AS A RESULT OF A RE-BLEED OF THE ANEURYSM. THE NEUROSURGERY TEAM CONSIDERED THE SURGERY EXTREMELY HIGH RISK GIVEN THE PATIENT'S PRE-PROCEDURE CONDITION, AND REPORTED THAT THE DEATH WAS NOT DUE TO THE CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED IN THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Ruptured Aneurysm
MAUDE report 12029245 ↗MalfunctionJul 17, 2020Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED AFTER PLACEMENT OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IN AN ANEURYSM, THE COIL COULD NOT BE DETACHED WITH THE CONTROLLER. DURING REMOVAL, THE COIL DETACHED FROM THE PUSHER WIRE. BOTH SEGMENTS OF THE COIL WERE REMOVED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10292584 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page