Skip to content

HydroSoft 3D 100208HFRM-V-3D-A2Recalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · V-Trak · Class 2 · Implant

All models of HydroSoft 3D (26)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816777026521), received between Jul 17, 2020 and Mar 4, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation2
  • Component Missing1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Separation Failure1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Ruptured Aneurysm1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2025Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED THE INTRODUCER FAILED TO DETECT THE INSERTION OF THE COIL INSIDE. THE COIL COULD NOT BE USED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CLARIFIED THAT THERE WAS NO COIL AT THE DISTAL PART OF THE PUSHER. ANOTHER COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. PATIENT STATUS IS GOOD; THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT INJURY OR CONSEQUENCE. NO OTHER CLARIFICATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21521232 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IMPLANT ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE DURING ADVANCEMENT IN A MICROCATHETER. THE COIL BECAME STUCK AND WAS REMOVED. DURING REMOVAL, THE IMPLANT DETACHED FROM THE PUSHER. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AN THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER COIL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17455834 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2022Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION OF ANEURYSM, THE COIL WAS POSITIONED FOR DESIRABLE PLACEMENT. THE COIL BECAME STUCK WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER, STRETCHED AND COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN. THE COIL WAS REMOVED USING A SNARE DEVICE SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT HARM OR INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13745385 ↗
  • DeathJun 18, 2021Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT MV COILS WERE UTILIZED TO TREAT A SERIOUSLY ILL PATIENT WITH A RUPTURED ANEURYSM OF THE ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY. AFTER SUCCESSFUL PLACEMENT OF FOUR COILS, THE SURGEON REPORTED DIFFICULTY IN REPOSITIONING OF THE 5TH EMBOLIZATION COIL. THE COIL APPARENTLY DETACHED DURING REPOSITIONING, COULD NOT BE REMOVED, AND APPROXIMATELY 4CM OF THE COIL WAS LEFT IN THE ICA AND A1 SEGMENT OF THE ACA. A STENT WAS PLACED TO AFFIX THE COIL TO THE WALLS OF THE VESSEL. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE PASSED AWAY THE FOLLOWING DAY AS A RESULT OF A RE-BLEED OF THE ANEURYSM. THE NEUROSURGERY TEAM CONSIDERED THE SURGERY EXTREMELY HIGH RISK GIVEN THE PATIENT'S PRE-PROCEDURE CONDITION, AND REPORTED THAT THE DEATH WAS NOT DUE TO THE CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED IN THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Ruptured Aneurysm

    MAUDE report 12029245 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2020Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED AFTER PLACEMENT OF AN EMBOLIZATION COIL IN AN ANEURYSM, THE COIL COULD NOT BE DETACHED WITH THE CONTROLLER. DURING REMOVAL, THE COIL DETACHED FROM THE PUSHER WIRE. BOTH SEGMENTS OF THE COIL WERE REMOVED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10292584 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page