Skip to content

Optima Coil System OPTI2065COM18 (REF N/A)Recalls & reported problems

Balt USA LLC · The Optima Coil System is indicated for endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular abnormalities such as arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and arteriovenous fistulae. The Optima Coil System is also indicated for vascular occlusion of blood vessels within the neurovascular system to permanently obstruct blood flow to an aneurysm or other vascular malformation and for arterial and venous embolization in the peripheral vasculature. The Optima Coil System comprises of implant coil and a pusher assembly. The Optima Coil System is designed fr use with the XCEL Detachment Controller. The Optima coil is detached thermally with the XCEL Detachment Controller. · Class 2 · Implant

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00818053026546), received between Dec 21, 2023 and Apr 16, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K172390); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jan 3, 2024Open, Classified

    Discoloration was identified along the delivery pusher which was attributed to corrosion of the hypotube. The material which caused the corrosion was identified as remnants of solder flux residue remaining on the hypotube component of the delivery pusher. Due to the location of the delivery pusher within the delivery system, it is possible for the discoloration to mechanically break off from the delivery pusher, leaving the potential for the material to flow through the delivery system (i.e. microcatheter), and into the patient vasculature causing foreign emboli.

    Z-1041-2024 · Root cause: Material/Component Contamination · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 16, 2026Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "DURING A COIL EMBOLIZATION OF A SPINAL AVM, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY AN OPTIMA COMPLEX-18 (20 × 65) AS THE SEVENTH COIL THROUGH A HEADWAY 27 MICROCATHETER. DURING DEPLOYMENT, WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REPOSITION, HE REPORTED FEELING A "POP" AND SUBSEQUENTLY LOST ONE-TO-ONE CONTROL OF THE COIL. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE USING DIFFERENT GUIDEWIRES AND COIL PUSHERS TO ADVANCE THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE COIL OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER; HOWEVER, THESE ATTEMPTS WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE COIL WAS ULTIMATELY UNINTENTIONALLY SNARED BY A COIL PUSHER WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER, AND THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY REMOVE BOTH THE COIL AND MICROCATHETER. AFTER RE-ACCESSING WITH A HEADWAY DUO 156 CM MICROCATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED WITH ADDITIONAL COIL DEPLOYMENT. DURING PLACEMENT OF AN OPTIMAX SOFT (16 × 50), HE AGAIN EXPERIENCED LOSS OF ONE-TO-ONE CONTROL, AND THE COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED WITH GREATER THAN 50% OF THE COIL REMAINING WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. ATTEMPTS TO ADVANCE THE COIL USING GUIDEWIRES WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. A SYRINGE WAS THEN ATTACHED TO THE HUB, AND NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS APPLIED WHILE WITHDRAWING THE MICROCATHETER, RESULTING IN SUCCESSFUL

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24905277 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 26, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation

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

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19192416 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 21, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "IT WAS A CASE OF DIRECT CCF THE PHYSICAN PLANNED TO DO COILING AND EMBOLISATION WITH BALLON ASSISTING. THE SUPPORT SYSTEM WAS NEUROMAX AND NAVIEN072, THE ECHELON10 WAS PLACED INSIDE THE RENT WITH SUPPORT OF HYBRID1214D. THE ECHELON10 WAS CONNECTED WITH A FLUSH LINE. THE COIL WAS PREPARED AS PER IFU AND THEN ALIGNED TO THE HUB OF THE MICRO CATHETER, THE FIRST COIL SIZE OF 24*65 OPTIMA COMPLEX18 WAS TAKEN ON INTRODUZING, THE COIL WENT SMOOTHLY THROUGH THE SLEEVE INTO THE HUB OF ECHELON10 AND DETACHED LATER TOOK 22MM*65MM OPTIMA COMPLEX18 AND DETACHED NEXT PHYSICIAN TOOK 20MM*65MM OPTIMA COMPLEX18 THE COIL WENT SMOOTHLY THROUGH THE SLEEVE INTO THE HUB. PHYSICIAN WAS PUSHING THE COIL INTO THE RENT BUT THE COIL WAS NOT MOVING LATER PHYSICIAN WAS RETERVING COIL BUT NO MOVEMENT WAS HAPPENING. COIL HAD PRE-DETACHED BUT THE COIL WAS REMOVED WITH THE HELP OF CATCHMAXI40 COIL BEEN TAKEN OUT AND PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO INJECT SQUID WITH THE INFLATION OF COPERNIC 5*20 CASE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT ISSUE." INCIDENT REPORT FORM SUBMITTED FOR THIS COMPLAINT INDICATES THAT NO PATIENT INJURY WAS SUSTAINED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18374632 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K172390. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1988-2025 · May 8, 2025 · Open, Classified
    Optima Coil System REFs/UDI-DI codes: OPTI0156BLK 00810068568875 OPTI0158BLK 00810068568882 OPTI0103BLK 00810068568851 OPTI0258BLK 00810068568929 OPTI0212BLK 00810068568912 OPTI020
  • Z-0103-2023 · Sep 7, 2022 · Open, Classified
    Optima Coil System Model Number OPTI0208CSS10, Model Number OPTI0308CSS10. Used in endovascular procedures.
  • Z-1680-2022 · Jul 26, 2022 · Open, Classified
    Optima Coil System Model OPTI0520CSF10. For endovascular embolization.

Other Device, Neurovascular Embolization devices

All Device, Neurovascular Embolization devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.