Skip to content

Cook G06786Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Thal-Quick Chest Tube Set · Class 1 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002067868), received between Apr 9, 2015 and Feb 18, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Operates Differently Than Expected” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected2
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 18, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STERILE PACKAGING OF A THAL-QUICK CHEST TUBE SET WAS FOUND TO BE CONTAMINATED UPON OPENING THE PRODUCT, RESULTING IN THE PRODUCT NOT BEING USED FOR THE PLANNED PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. A PHOTO PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER SHOWS POSSIBLE PARTICULATE MATTER WITHIN THE SEALED PACKAGING. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24381064 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 17, 2022Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress

    A THAL-QUICK CHEST TUBE WAS BEING INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT USING SELDINGER TECHNIQUE. THE GUIDE WIRE WAS INSERTED FIRST, FOLLOWED BY THE DILATOR. WHEN ADVANCING THE DRAINAGE CATHETER, THE ADVANCEMENT WAS NOT SMOOTH. UPON INSPECTION OF THE GUIDE WIRE, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT IT WAS "BROKEN AND DAMAGED. THE WIRE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITHOUT ANY HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14733912 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 8, 2018Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    IT WAS REPORTED FOUR THAL-QUICK CHEST TUBE SETS WERE USED ON ONE PATIENT DURING A THORACENTESIS. THIS REPORT IDENTIFIES THE SECOND DEVICE USED. THE FIRST DEVICE (MEDWATCH 1820334-2018-01654) WAS INSERTED AND THE DOCTOR OBSERVED COILING OF THE WIRE AND CATHETER. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND FOUND TO BE FRAYED/DAMAGED. A SECOND DEVICE (MEDWATCH 1820334-2018-01721) FROM THE SAME LOT WAS INSERTED AND DRAINAGE BEGAN. THE DOCTOR OBSERVED AN INTRA-PLEURAL LOOP/KINK AND AT A CERTAIN POINT THE DRAINAGE STOPPED. LIQUID WAS STILL PRESENT INSIDE THE CAVITY, THEREFORE, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. A DIFFERENT DOCTOR OPENED A THIRD DEVICE FOR INSERTION AND WHEN TRYING TO REMOVE THE WIRE GUIDE, ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE. THE DEVICE WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO REMOVE AND BOTH THE WIRE GUIDE AND CATHETER WERE REMOVED. THE SAME DOCTOR USED A FOURTH AND FINAL DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. THREE OF THE FOUR REPORTED DEVICES WERE DISCARDED. ONE DEVICE, IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH FAILURE IT WILL PRESENT, WILL BE RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION. TO DATE, ADDITIONAL PATIENT, EVENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT NOT PROVIDED. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE AD

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7581800 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 8, 2018Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    IT WAS REPORTED FOUR THAL-QUICK CHEST TUBE SETS WERE USED ON ONE PATIENT DURING A THORACENTESIS. THIS REPORT IDENTIFIES THE FIRST DEVICE USED. THE FIRST DEVICE (MEDWATCH 1820334-2018-01654) WAS INSERTED AND THE DOCTOR OBSERVED COILING OF THE WIRE AND CATHETER. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND FOUND TO BE FRAYED/DAMAGED. A SECOND DEVICE (MEDWATCH 1820334-2018-01721) FROM THE SAME LOT WAS INSERTED AND DRAINAGE BEGAN. THE DOCTOR OBSERVED AN INTRA-PLEURAL LOOP/KINK AND AT A CERTAIN POINT THE DRAINAGE STOPPED. LIQUID WAS STILL PRESENT INSIDE THE CAVITY, THEREFORE, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. A DIFFERENT DOCTOR OPENED A THIRD DEVICE FOR INSERTION AND WHEN TRYING TO REMOVE THE WIRE GUIDE, ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE. THE DEVICE WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO REMOVE AND BOTH THE WIRE GUIDE AND CATHETER WERE REMOVED. THE SAME DOCTOR USED A FOURTH AND FINAL DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. THREE OF THE FOUR REPORTED DEVICES WERE DISCARDED. ONE DEVICE, IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH FAILURE IT WILL PRESENT, WILL BE RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION. TO DATE, ADDITIONAL PATIENT, EVENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT NOT PROVIDED. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ADD

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7581637 ↗
  • InjuryNov 17, 2016Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    PER THE MW(B)(4), REPORTED THROUGH THE FDA VOLUNTARY EVENT REPORTING PROCESS, THE MANUFACTURER WAS INFORMED THAT THE GUIDE WIRE WAS NOT REMOVED AFTER CHEST TUBE PLACEMENT. THE REPORTER ALLEGED THAT THE "TAG THAT SAYS "REMOVE DILATOR AFTER CHEST TUBE INSERTION" IS NOT VERY NOTICEABLE OR UNDERSTANDABLE." IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER IN RESPONSE TO INQUIRY'S THAT: THE DRAINAGE BEING PERFORMED WAS PNEUMOTHORAX, NO UNINTENDED SECTIONS OF THE DEVICE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT, AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED, THE COMPLAINED DEVICE WAS IN PLACE FOR 1 DAY, THE CHEST TUBE WAS REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE AND REMAINED IN FOR 2 DAYS, THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS OCCURRED DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6110276 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2015Material Separation

    THE HUB SEPARATED FROM THE CATHETER SHAFT ONE WEEK AFTER INSERTION. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AS PREVIOUSLY INTENDED AND NO OTHER CATHETER WAS INSERTED. PHOTO IMAGES WERE PROVIDED BUT VERY LIMITED INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT AND THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED BY THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 4687617 ↗

Other CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices

All CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page